Integration of epidemiological findings with mechanistic evidence in regulatory pesticide risk assessment: EFSA experiences

Olavi Pelkonen*, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Federica Crivellente, Andrea Terron, Antonio F. Hernandez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Toxicological risk assessment of plant protection products (PPP) is currently carried out with the principal input from regulatory toxicology studies following OECD test guidelines, with little input from epidemiological data. An EFSA-commissioned systematic review of pesticide epidemiological studies (Ntzani et al. in Literature review on epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and health effects. EFSA supporting publication 2013:EN-497, 2013) revealed statistically significant associations, among others, between pesticide exposures, and Parkinson's disease and childhood leukemia. Thereafter, EFSA launched a project with a mandate for the plant protection products and their residues (PPR) Panel to set the ground for the use of epidemiological data in the risk assessment of pesticides, as requested by Regulation (EC) 1107/2009. The project culminated with the publication of two EFSA's scientific opinions on the potential contribution of experimental investigations and epidemiological studies in PPP risk assessment and with the scientific conference held on 20 November 2017, in Parma, Italy. The application of modern methodologies in exposure assessment, toxicology and epidemiology would improve the pesticide risk assessment process and support a mechanistic shift for the integration of these three disciplines under a novel paradigm in risk assessment. The application of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) conceptual framework to this approach would contribute to gain insight into the biological plausibility of a hazard identified in epidemiological or experimental studies and would inform an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) within a regulatory context.
Original languageEnglish
JournalArchives of Toxicology
Volume93
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1779-1788
ISSN0340-5761
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Adverse outcome pathway (AOP)
  • Epidemiology
  • Exposure
  • Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA)
  • Pesticides
  • Plant protection products
  • Risk assessment

Cite this

Pelkonen, Olavi ; Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard ; Crivellente, Federica ; Terron, Andrea ; Hernandez, Antonio F. / Integration of epidemiological findings with mechanistic evidence in regulatory pesticide risk assessment: EFSA experiences. In: Archives of Toxicology. 2019 ; Vol. 93, No. 6. pp. 1779-1788.
@article{d68c139033ec4fd5a936e601661be1e9,
title = "Integration of epidemiological findings with mechanistic evidence in regulatory pesticide risk assessment: EFSA experiences",
abstract = "Toxicological risk assessment of plant protection products (PPP) is currently carried out with the principal input from regulatory toxicology studies following OECD test guidelines, with little input from epidemiological data. An EFSA-commissioned systematic review of pesticide epidemiological studies (Ntzani et al. in Literature review on epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and health effects. EFSA supporting publication 2013:EN-497, 2013) revealed statistically significant associations, among others, between pesticide exposures, and Parkinson's disease and childhood leukemia. Thereafter, EFSA launched a project with a mandate for the plant protection products and their residues (PPR) Panel to set the ground for the use of epidemiological data in the risk assessment of pesticides, as requested by Regulation (EC) 1107/2009. The project culminated with the publication of two EFSA's scientific opinions on the potential contribution of experimental investigations and epidemiological studies in PPP risk assessment and with the scientific conference held on 20 November 2017, in Parma, Italy. The application of modern methodologies in exposure assessment, toxicology and epidemiology would improve the pesticide risk assessment process and support a mechanistic shift for the integration of these three disciplines under a novel paradigm in risk assessment. The application of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) conceptual framework to this approach would contribute to gain insight into the biological plausibility of a hazard identified in epidemiological or experimental studies and would inform an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) within a regulatory context.",
keywords = "Adverse outcome pathway (AOP), Epidemiology, Exposure, Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA), Pesticides, Plant protection products, Risk assessment",
author = "Olavi Pelkonen and Bennekou, {Susanne Hougaard} and Federica Crivellente and Andrea Terron and Hernandez, {Antonio F.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s00204-019-02467-w",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "1779--1788",
journal = "Archives of Toxicology",
issn = "0340-5761",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

Integration of epidemiological findings with mechanistic evidence in regulatory pesticide risk assessment: EFSA experiences. / Pelkonen, Olavi; Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard; Crivellente, Federica; Terron, Andrea; Hernandez, Antonio F.

In: Archives of Toxicology, Vol. 93, No. 6, 2019, p. 1779-1788.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integration of epidemiological findings with mechanistic evidence in regulatory pesticide risk assessment: EFSA experiences

AU - Pelkonen, Olavi

AU - Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard

AU - Crivellente, Federica

AU - Terron, Andrea

AU - Hernandez, Antonio F.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Toxicological risk assessment of plant protection products (PPP) is currently carried out with the principal input from regulatory toxicology studies following OECD test guidelines, with little input from epidemiological data. An EFSA-commissioned systematic review of pesticide epidemiological studies (Ntzani et al. in Literature review on epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and health effects. EFSA supporting publication 2013:EN-497, 2013) revealed statistically significant associations, among others, between pesticide exposures, and Parkinson's disease and childhood leukemia. Thereafter, EFSA launched a project with a mandate for the plant protection products and their residues (PPR) Panel to set the ground for the use of epidemiological data in the risk assessment of pesticides, as requested by Regulation (EC) 1107/2009. The project culminated with the publication of two EFSA's scientific opinions on the potential contribution of experimental investigations and epidemiological studies in PPP risk assessment and with the scientific conference held on 20 November 2017, in Parma, Italy. The application of modern methodologies in exposure assessment, toxicology and epidemiology would improve the pesticide risk assessment process and support a mechanistic shift for the integration of these three disciplines under a novel paradigm in risk assessment. The application of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) conceptual framework to this approach would contribute to gain insight into the biological plausibility of a hazard identified in epidemiological or experimental studies and would inform an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) within a regulatory context.

AB - Toxicological risk assessment of plant protection products (PPP) is currently carried out with the principal input from regulatory toxicology studies following OECD test guidelines, with little input from epidemiological data. An EFSA-commissioned systematic review of pesticide epidemiological studies (Ntzani et al. in Literature review on epidemiological studies linking exposure to pesticides and health effects. EFSA supporting publication 2013:EN-497, 2013) revealed statistically significant associations, among others, between pesticide exposures, and Parkinson's disease and childhood leukemia. Thereafter, EFSA launched a project with a mandate for the plant protection products and their residues (PPR) Panel to set the ground for the use of epidemiological data in the risk assessment of pesticides, as requested by Regulation (EC) 1107/2009. The project culminated with the publication of two EFSA's scientific opinions on the potential contribution of experimental investigations and epidemiological studies in PPP risk assessment and with the scientific conference held on 20 November 2017, in Parma, Italy. The application of modern methodologies in exposure assessment, toxicology and epidemiology would improve the pesticide risk assessment process and support a mechanistic shift for the integration of these three disciplines under a novel paradigm in risk assessment. The application of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) conceptual framework to this approach would contribute to gain insight into the biological plausibility of a hazard identified in epidemiological or experimental studies and would inform an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) within a regulatory context.

KW - Adverse outcome pathway (AOP)

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Exposure

KW - Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA)

KW - Pesticides

KW - Plant protection products

KW - Risk assessment

U2 - 10.1007/s00204-019-02467-w

DO - 10.1007/s00204-019-02467-w

M3 - Journal article

VL - 93

SP - 1779

EP - 1788

JO - Archives of Toxicology

JF - Archives of Toxicology

SN - 0340-5761

IS - 6

ER -