TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated working fluid-thermodynamic cycle design of organic Rankine cycle power systems for waste heat recovery
AU - Cignitti, Stefano
AU - Andreasen, Jesper Graa
AU - Haglind, Fredrik
AU - Woodley, John
AU - Abildskov, Jens
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Today, some established working fluids are being phased out due to new international regulations on theuse of environmentally harmful substances. With an ever-increasing cost to resources, industry wants toconverge on improved sustainability through resource recovery, and in particular waste heat recovery. Inthis paper, an organic Rankine cycle process and its pure working fluid are designed simultaneously forwaste heat recovery of the exhaust gas from a marine diesel engine. This approach can overcome designissues caused by the high sensitivity between the fluid and cycle design variables and otherwise highresource demands, which through conventional methods cannot be addressed. The global optimal designwas a 1.2MW cycle with 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluorohexane as the new fluid. The fluid has no ozone depletionpotential and a global warming potential under the regulatory limit. By using the simultaneousdesign approach the optimum solution was found in 5.04 s, while a decomposed approach found thesame solution in 5.77 h. However, the decomposed approach provided insights on the correlationbetween the fluid and cycle design variables by analyzing all possible solutions. It was shown that thehigh sensitivity between the fluid and cycle design variables was overcome by using the simultaneousapproach. Correlation between net power output and the product of the overall heat transfer coefficientand the heat transfer area could further be addressed by employing a new solution strategy includingmaximum constraints for this product. The use of such constraints resulted in the design of a new fluid(5-chloro-4,5,5-trifluoro-2,3-dimethylpent-2-ene) with a 1.25 MW net power output. Finally, a comparisonwith conventional fluids was shown where 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluorohexane offered an improvementon net power output and economic and environmental metrics.
AB - Today, some established working fluids are being phased out due to new international regulations on theuse of environmentally harmful substances. With an ever-increasing cost to resources, industry wants toconverge on improved sustainability through resource recovery, and in particular waste heat recovery. Inthis paper, an organic Rankine cycle process and its pure working fluid are designed simultaneously forwaste heat recovery of the exhaust gas from a marine diesel engine. This approach can overcome designissues caused by the high sensitivity between the fluid and cycle design variables and otherwise highresource demands, which through conventional methods cannot be addressed. The global optimal designwas a 1.2MW cycle with 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluorohexane as the new fluid. The fluid has no ozone depletionpotential and a global warming potential under the regulatory limit. By using the simultaneousdesign approach the optimum solution was found in 5.04 s, while a decomposed approach found thesame solution in 5.77 h. However, the decomposed approach provided insights on the correlationbetween the fluid and cycle design variables by analyzing all possible solutions. It was shown that thehigh sensitivity between the fluid and cycle design variables was overcome by using the simultaneousapproach. Correlation between net power output and the product of the overall heat transfer coefficientand the heat transfer area could further be addressed by employing a new solution strategy includingmaximum constraints for this product. The use of such constraints resulted in the design of a new fluid(5-chloro-4,5,5-trifluoro-2,3-dimethylpent-2-ene) with a 1.25 MW net power output. Finally, a comparisonwith conventional fluids was shown where 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluorohexane offered an improvementon net power output and economic and environmental metrics.
KW - Integrated design
KW - Optimization
KW - CAMD
KW - Organic Rankine cycle
KW - Working fluid
KW - Waste heat
U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.031
DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.031
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0306-2619
VL - 203
SP - 442
EP - 453
JO - Applied Energy
JF - Applied Energy
ER -