Integrated ecological-economic fisheries models - evaluation, review and challenges for implementation

J. Rasmus Nielsen; Eric Thunberg; Daniel S. Holland; Jörn O. Schmidt; E. A. Fulton; Francois Bastardie; A.E. Punt; Icarus Allen; Heleen Bartelings; Michel  Bertignac; Eckhard Bethke; Sieme Bossier; R. Buckworth; Griffin Carpenter; Asbjørn Christensen; Villy Christensen; Jose Maria  Da Rocha; Roy Deng; Catherine M. Dichmont; Ralf Döring; Aniol Esteban; Jose A. Fernandes; Hans Frost; Dorleta García; L. Gasche; Didier Gascuel; Sophie  Gourguet; R.A. Groeneveld; Jordi  Guillén; Olivier Guyader; Katell Hamon; Ayoe Hoff; J. Horbowy; Trevor Hutton; Sigrid Lehuta; L. Richard Little; Jordi Lleonart; Claire Macher; Steven Mackinson; Stephanie Mahevas; Paul Marchal; Rosa  Mato-Amboage; Bruce Mapstone; Francesc  Maynou; Mathieu Merzéréaud; Artur Palacz; Sean Pascoe; Anton Paulrud; Eva Plaganyi; Raul Prellezo; Elizabeth I  van Putten; Martin F. Quaas; Lars Ravn-Jonsen; Sonia Sanchez; Sarah Simons; O. Thébaud; Maciej T. Tomczak; Clara Ulrich; Diana  van Dijk; Youen Vermard; Rüdiger Voss; Staffan Waldo

doi:10.1111/faf.12232

Integrated ecological-economic fisheries models - evaluation, review and challenges for implementation

J. Rasmus Nielsen^*, Eric Thunberg, Daniel S. Holland, Jörn O. Schmidt, E. A. Fulton, Francois Bastardie, A.E. Punt, Icarus Allen, Heleen Bartelings, Michel Bertignac, Eckhard Bethke, Sieme Bossier, R. Buckworth, Griffin Carpenter, Asbjørn Christensen, Villy Christensen, Jose Maria Da Rocha, Roy Deng, Catherine M. Dichmont, Ralf DöringAniol Esteban, Jose A. Fernandes, Hans Frost, Dorleta García, L. Gasche, Didier Gascuel, Sophie Gourguet, R.A. Groeneveld, Jordi Guillén, Olivier Guyader, Katell Hamon, Ayoe Hoff, J. Horbowy, Trevor Hutton, Sigrid Lehuta, L. Richard Little, Jordi Lleonart, Claire Macher, Steven Mackinson, Stephanie Mahevas, Paul Marchal, Rosa Mato-Amboage, Bruce Mapstone, Francesc Maynou, Mathieu Merzéréaud, Artur Palacz, Sean Pascoe, Anton Paulrud, Eva Plaganyi, Raul Prellezo, Elizabeth I van Putten, Martin F. Quaas, Lars Ravn-Jonsen, Sonia Sanchez, Sarah Simons, O. Thébaud, Maciej T. Tomczak, Clara Ulrich, Diana van Dijk, Youen Vermard, Rüdiger Voss, Staffan Waldo

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

727 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Marine ecosystems evolve under many interconnected and area-specific pressures. In order to fulfill society's intensifying and diversifying needs whilst ensuring ecologically sustainable development, more effective marine spatial planning and broader-scope management of marine resources is necessary. Integrated ecological–socioeconomic fisheries models (IESFM) of marine systems are nee¬ded to evaluate impacts and sustainability of potential management actions and understand, and anti¬ci¬pate ecological, economic, and social dynamics at a range of scales from local to national and regional. To make these models most effective, it is important to determine how model characteristics and methods of communicating results influence the model implementation, the nature of the advice that can be provided and the impact on decisions taken by managers. This paper presents a global review and comparative evaluation of 35 IESFM´s applied to marine fisheries and marine ecosystem resources to identify the characteristics that determine their usefulness, effectiveness and implementation. The focus is on fully integrated models that allow for feedbacks between ecological and human processes though not all the models reviewed achieve that

Original language	English
Journal	Fish and Fisheries
Volume	19
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	1-29
ISSN	1467-2960
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12232
Publication status	Published - 2018

Keywords

Bio‐economic models
Comparative model evaluation
Fisheries management advice
Integrated ecological–economic fisheries models
Marine spatial planning and cross‐sector management
Performance criteria and scales and risks
Use and acceptance and implementation and communication and flexibility and complexity

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1111/faf.12232

Publishers versionFinal published version, 1.28 MB

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

Nielsen, J. R., Thunberg, E., Holland, D. S., Schmidt, J. O., Fulton, E. A., Bastardie, F., Punt, A. E., Allen, I., Bartelings, H., Bertignac, M., Bethke, E., Bossier, S., Buckworth, R., Carpenter, G., Christensen, A., Christensen, V., Da Rocha, J. M., Deng, R., Dichmont, C. M., ... Waldo, S. (2018). Integrated ecological-economic fisheries models - evaluation, review and challenges for implementation. Fish and Fisheries, 19(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12232

@article{83c9da893e6e4bd48267055272df6bf2,

title = "Integrated ecological-economic fisheries models - evaluation, review and challenges for implementation",

abstract = "Marine ecosystems evolve under many interconnected and area-specific pressures. In order to fulfill society's intensifying and diversifying needs whilst ensuring ecologically sustainable development, more effective marine spatial planning and broader-scope management of marine resources is necessary. Integrated ecological–socioeconomic fisheries models (IESFM) of marine systems are nee¬ded to evaluate impacts and sustainability of potential management actions and understand, and anti¬ci¬pate ecological, economic, and social dynamics at a range of scales from local to national and regional. To make these models most effective, it is important to determine how model characteristics and methods of communicating results influence the model implementation, the nature of the advice that can be provided and the impact on decisions taken by managers. This paper presents a global review and comparative evaluation of 35 IESFM´s applied to marine fisheries and marine ecosystem resources to identify the characteristics that determine their usefulness, effectiveness and implementation. The focus is on fully integrated models that allow for feedbacks between ecological and human processes though not all the models reviewed achieve that ",

keywords = "Bio‐economic models, Comparative model evaluation, Fisheries management advice, Integrated ecological–economic fisheries models, Marine spatial planning and cross‐sector management, Performance criteria and scales and risks, Use and acceptance and implementation and communication and flexibility and complexity",

author = "Nielsen, {J. Rasmus} and Eric Thunberg and Holland, {Daniel S.} and Schmidt, {J{\"o}rn O.} and Fulton, {E. A.} and Francois Bastardie and A.E. Punt and Icarus Allen and Heleen Bartelings and Michel Bertignac and Eckhard Bethke and Sieme Bossier and R. Buckworth and Griffin Carpenter and Asbj{\o}rn Christensen and Villy Christensen and {Da Rocha}, {Jose Maria} and Roy Deng and Dichmont, {Catherine M.} and Ralf D{\"o}ring and Aniol Esteban and Fernandes, {Jose A.} and Hans Frost and Dorleta Garc{\'i}a and L. Gasche and Didier Gascuel and Sophie Gourguet and R.A. Groeneveld and Jordi Guill{\'e}n and Olivier Guyader and Katell Hamon and Ayoe Hoff and J. Horbowy and Trevor Hutton and Sigrid Lehuta and Little, {L. Richard} and Jordi Lleonart and Claire Macher and Steven Mackinson and Stephanie Mahevas and Paul Marchal and Rosa Mato-Amboage and Bruce Mapstone and Francesc Maynou and Mathieu Merz{\'e}r{\'e}aud and Artur Palacz and Sean Pascoe and Anton Paulrud and Eva Plaganyi and Raul Prellezo and {van Putten}, {Elizabeth I} and Quaas, {Martin F.} and Lars Ravn-Jonsen and Sonia Sanchez and Sarah Simons and O. Th{\'e}baud and Tomczak, {Maciej T.} and Clara Ulrich and {van Dijk}, Diana and Youen Vermard and R{\"u}diger Voss and Staffan Waldo",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.1111/faf.12232",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "1--29",

journal = "Fish and Fisheries",

issn = "1467-2960",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "1",

}

Nielsen, JR, Thunberg, E, Holland, DS, Schmidt, JO, Fulton, EA, Bastardie, F, Punt, AE, Allen, I, Bartelings, H, Bertignac, M, Bethke, E, Bossier, S, Buckworth, R, Carpenter, G, Christensen, A, Christensen, V, Da Rocha, JM, Deng, R, Dichmont, CM, Döring, R, Esteban, A, Fernandes, JA, Frost, H, García, D, Gasche, L, Gascuel, D, Gourguet, S, Groeneveld, RA, Guillén, J, Guyader, O, Hamon, K, Hoff, A, Horbowy, J, Hutton, T, Lehuta, S, Little, LR, Lleonart, J, Macher, C, Mackinson, S, Mahevas, S, Marchal, P, Mato-Amboage, R, Mapstone, B, Maynou, F, Merzéréaud, M, Palacz, A, Pascoe, S, Paulrud, A, Plaganyi, E, Prellezo, R, van Putten, EI, Quaas, MF, Ravn-Jonsen, L, Sanchez, S, Simons, S, Thébaud, O, Tomczak, MT, Ulrich, C, van Dijk, D, Vermard, Y, Voss, R & Waldo, S 2018, 'Integrated ecological-economic fisheries models - evaluation, review and challenges for implementation', Fish and Fisheries, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12232

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrated ecological-economic fisheries models - evaluation, review and challenges for implementation

AU - Nielsen, J. Rasmus

AU - Thunberg, Eric

AU - Holland, Daniel S.

AU - Schmidt, Jörn O.

AU - Fulton, E. A.

AU - Bastardie, Francois

AU - Punt, A.E.

AU - Allen, Icarus

AU - Bartelings, Heleen

AU - Bertignac, Michel

AU - Bethke, Eckhard

AU - Bossier, Sieme

AU - Buckworth, R.

AU - Carpenter, Griffin

AU - Christensen, Asbjørn

AU - Christensen, Villy

AU - Da Rocha, Jose Maria

AU - Deng, Roy

AU - Dichmont, Catherine M.

AU - Döring, Ralf

AU - Esteban, Aniol

AU - Fernandes, Jose A.

AU - Frost, Hans

AU - García, Dorleta

AU - Gasche, L.

AU - Gascuel, Didier

AU - Gourguet, Sophie

AU - Groeneveld, R.A.

AU - Guillén, Jordi

AU - Guyader, Olivier

AU - Hamon, Katell

AU - Hoff, Ayoe

AU - Horbowy, J.

AU - Hutton, Trevor

AU - Lehuta, Sigrid

AU - Little, L. Richard

AU - Lleonart, Jordi

AU - Macher, Claire

AU - Mackinson, Steven

AU - Mahevas, Stephanie

AU - Marchal, Paul

AU - Mato-Amboage, Rosa

AU - Mapstone, Bruce

AU - Maynou, Francesc

AU - Merzéréaud, Mathieu

AU - Palacz, Artur

AU - Pascoe, Sean

AU - Paulrud, Anton

AU - Plaganyi, Eva

AU - Prellezo, Raul

AU - van Putten, Elizabeth I

AU - Quaas, Martin F.

AU - Ravn-Jonsen, Lars

AU - Sanchez, Sonia

AU - Simons, Sarah

AU - Thébaud, O.

AU - Tomczak, Maciej T.

AU - Ulrich, Clara

AU - van Dijk, Diana

AU - Vermard, Youen

AU - Voss, Rüdiger

AU - Waldo, Staffan

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Marine ecosystems evolve under many interconnected and area-specific pressures. In order to fulfill society's intensifying and diversifying needs whilst ensuring ecologically sustainable development, more effective marine spatial planning and broader-scope management of marine resources is necessary. Integrated ecological–socioeconomic fisheries models (IESFM) of marine systems are nee¬ded to evaluate impacts and sustainability of potential management actions and understand, and anti¬ci¬pate ecological, economic, and social dynamics at a range of scales from local to national and regional. To make these models most effective, it is important to determine how model characteristics and methods of communicating results influence the model implementation, the nature of the advice that can be provided and the impact on decisions taken by managers. This paper presents a global review and comparative evaluation of 35 IESFM´s applied to marine fisheries and marine ecosystem resources to identify the characteristics that determine their usefulness, effectiveness and implementation. The focus is on fully integrated models that allow for feedbacks between ecological and human processes though not all the models reviewed achieve that

AB - Marine ecosystems evolve under many interconnected and area-specific pressures. In order to fulfill society's intensifying and diversifying needs whilst ensuring ecologically sustainable development, more effective marine spatial planning and broader-scope management of marine resources is necessary. Integrated ecological–socioeconomic fisheries models (IESFM) of marine systems are nee¬ded to evaluate impacts and sustainability of potential management actions and understand, and anti¬ci¬pate ecological, economic, and social dynamics at a range of scales from local to national and regional. To make these models most effective, it is important to determine how model characteristics and methods of communicating results influence the model implementation, the nature of the advice that can be provided and the impact on decisions taken by managers. This paper presents a global review and comparative evaluation of 35 IESFM´s applied to marine fisheries and marine ecosystem resources to identify the characteristics that determine their usefulness, effectiveness and implementation. The focus is on fully integrated models that allow for feedbacks between ecological and human processes though not all the models reviewed achieve that

KW - Bio‐economic models

KW - Comparative model evaluation

KW - Fisheries management advice

KW - Integrated ecological–economic fisheries models

KW - Marine spatial planning and cross‐sector management

KW - Performance criteria and scales and risks

KW - Use and acceptance and implementation and communication and flexibility and complexity

U2 - 10.1111/faf.12232

DO - 10.1111/faf.12232

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1467-2960

VL - 19

SP - 1

EP - 29

JO - Fish and Fisheries

JF - Fish and Fisheries

IS - 1

ER -

Integrated ecological-economic fisheries models - evaluation, review and challenges for implementation

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

OpenUrl availability

Fingerprint

Cite this