TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of the processing on composition, protein structure and techno-functional properties of mealworm protein concentrates produced by isoelectric precipitation and ultrafiltration/diafiltration
AU - Pinel, Gwenn
AU - Berthelot, Ugo
AU - Queiroz, Lucas Sales
AU - Santiago, Livia De Almeida
AU - Silva, Naaman Francisco Nogueira
AU - Petersen, Heidi Olander
AU - Sloth, Jens J.
AU - Altay, Ipek
AU - Marie, Rodolphe
AU - Feyissa, Aberham Hailu
AU - Casanova, Federico
AU - Doyen, Alain
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Edible insects represent a great alternative protein source but food neophobia remains the main barrier to consumption. However, the incorporation of insects as protein-rich ingredients, such as protein concentrates, could increase acceptance. In this study, two methods, isoelectric precipitation and ultrafiltration-diafiltration, were applied to produce mealworm protein concentrates, which were compared in terms of composition, protein structure and techno-functional properties. The results showed that the protein content of the isoelectric precipitation concentrate was higher than ultrafiltration-diafiltration (80 versus 72%) but ash (1.91 versus 3.82%) and soluble sugar (1.43 versus 8.22%) contents were lower. Moreover, the protein structure was affected by the processing method, where the ultrafiltration-diafiltration concentrate exhibited a higher surface hydrophobicity (493.5 versus 106.78 a.u) and a lower denaturation temperature (161.32 versus 181.44 °C). Finally, the ultrafiltration-diafiltration concentrate exhibited higher solubility (87 versus 41%) and emulsifying properties at pH 7 compared to the concentrate obtained by isoelectric precipitation.
AB - Edible insects represent a great alternative protein source but food neophobia remains the main barrier to consumption. However, the incorporation of insects as protein-rich ingredients, such as protein concentrates, could increase acceptance. In this study, two methods, isoelectric precipitation and ultrafiltration-diafiltration, were applied to produce mealworm protein concentrates, which were compared in terms of composition, protein structure and techno-functional properties. The results showed that the protein content of the isoelectric precipitation concentrate was higher than ultrafiltration-diafiltration (80 versus 72%) but ash (1.91 versus 3.82%) and soluble sugar (1.43 versus 8.22%) contents were lower. Moreover, the protein structure was affected by the processing method, where the ultrafiltration-diafiltration concentrate exhibited a higher surface hydrophobicity (493.5 versus 106.78 a.u) and a lower denaturation temperature (161.32 versus 181.44 °C). Finally, the ultrafiltration-diafiltration concentrate exhibited higher solubility (87 versus 41%) and emulsifying properties at pH 7 compared to the concentrate obtained by isoelectric precipitation.
KW - Tenebrio molitor
KW - Protein concentrate
KW - Isoelectric precipitation
KW - Ultrafiltration-diafiltration
KW - Techno-functional properties
U2 - 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139177
DO - 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139177
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38581785
SN - 0308-8146
VL - 449
JO - Food Chemistry
JF - Food Chemistry
M1 - 139177
ER -