TY - JOUR
T1 - Increasing the Accuracy of Hourly Multi-Output Solar Power Forecast with Physics-Informed Machine Learning
AU - Pombo, Daniel Vázquez
AU - Bindner, Henrik W.
AU - Spataru, Sergiu Viorel
AU - Sørensen, Poul Ejnar
AU - Bacher, Peder
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Machine Learning (ML)-based methods have been identified as capable of providing up to one day ahead Photovoltaic (PV) power forecasts. In this research, we introduce a generic physical model of a PV system into ML predictors to forecast from one to three days ahead. The only requirement is a basic dataset including power, wind speed and air temperature measurements. Then, these are recombined into physics informed metrics able to capture the operational point of the PV. In this way, the models learn about the physical relationships of the different features, effectively easing training. In order to generalise the results, we also present a methodology evaluating this physics informed approach. We present a study-case of a PV system in Denmark to validate our claims by extensively evaluating five different ML methods: Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and a hybrid CNN–LSTM. The results show consistently how the best predictors use the proposed physics-informed features disregarding the particular ML-method, and forecasting horizon. However, also, how there is a threshold regarding the number of previous samples to be included that appears as a convex function.
AB - Machine Learning (ML)-based methods have been identified as capable of providing up to one day ahead Photovoltaic (PV) power forecasts. In this research, we introduce a generic physical model of a PV system into ML predictors to forecast from one to three days ahead. The only requirement is a basic dataset including power, wind speed and air temperature measurements. Then, these are recombined into physics informed metrics able to capture the operational point of the PV. In this way, the models learn about the physical relationships of the different features, effectively easing training. In order to generalise the results, we also present a methodology evaluating this physics informed approach. We present a study-case of a PV system in Denmark to validate our claims by extensively evaluating five different ML methods: Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and a hybrid CNN–LSTM. The results show consistently how the best predictors use the proposed physics-informed features disregarding the particular ML-method, and forecasting horizon. However, also, how there is a threshold regarding the number of previous samples to be included that appears as a convex function.
KW - Solar power forecasting
KW - Deep-learning
KW - Physics-informed machine learning
KW - PV
UR - https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.17040767.v2
UR - https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.17040626.v2
U2 - 10.3390/s22030749
DO - 10.3390/s22030749
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35161500
SN - 1424-8220
VL - 22
JO - Sensors
JF - Sensors
IS - 3
M1 - 749
ER -