In Vivo Evaluation of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming

  • Martin Christian Hemmsen
  • , Peter Møller Hansen
  • , Theis Lange
  • , Jens Munk Hansen
  • , Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen
  • , Michael Bachmann Nielsen
  • , Jørgen Arendt Jensen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    3 Downloads (Orbit)

    Abstract

    Ultrasound in vivo imaging using synthetic aperture sequential beamformation (SASB) is compared with conventional imaging in a double blinded study using side-by-side comparisons. The objective is to evaluate if the image quality in terms of penetration depth, spatial resolution, contrast and unwanted artifacts is comparable to conventional imaging. In vivo data was acquired using a ProFocus ultrasound scanner (BK Medical, Herlev, Denmark) and a 192-element 3.5 MHz convex array transducer (Sound Technology Inc., PA, USA). Data were acquired interleaved, ensuring that the exact same anatomical locations were scanned. Eighteen volunteers were scanned abdominally resulting in 85 image sequence pairs. Evaluation of image quality was performed by five medical doctors. Results show that image quality using SASB was significantly better than conventional imaging (p value: <0.01). There was not a significant difference in penetration depth (p value: 0.55). The study supports that in vivo ultrasound imaging using SASB is feasible for abdominal imaging.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalUltrasound in Medicine & Biology
    Volume38
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)708–716
    ISSN0301-5629
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

    Keywords

    • Ultrasound imaging
    • Synthetic aperture sequential beamforming
    • In vivo evaluation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'In Vivo Evaluation of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this