Improving Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies through Public Engagement: The Neglected Case of Nano-Remediation?

Khara Deanne Grieger, Fern Wickson, Henning Boje Andersen, Ortwin Renn

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    While public engagement is internationally considered to be crucial for successful governance of nanotechnologies (NT), it has not necessarily been clear what the relationship is (or should be) between these engagement efforts and the more traditional governance practice of scientific risk assessment. This paper therefore carries out a literature review to capture and analyse how governance strategies have focused on public engagement for NT and how such engagement relates to processes of risk analysis. To further investigate these issues, we focus on a specific NT application as a case study: the use of nanoparticles for environmental remediation (nano-remediation). Through our review and analysis we find that the main approaches to incorporating public engagement into governance strategies have been the generation of a better understanding of public perceptions of NT and the setting of general research priorities. In the case of nano-remediation, we find that public engagement efforts have been extremely limited, even though this technology has been used in the field in several countries and highlighted as potentially problematic by others. Finally, we provide recommendations for improving the links between public engagement and risk assessment and specifically call for more work on the case of nano-remediation.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInternational Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society
    Volume10
    Pages (from-to)61–78
    ISSN1835-8780
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • Risk Governance
    • Public Engagement
    • Nanotechnology
    • Nano-Remediation
    • Emerging Technologies

    Cite this

    @article{074d726ac3eb4f42b3d584423784c9da,
    title = "Improving Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies through Public Engagement: The Neglected Case of Nano-Remediation?",
    abstract = "While public engagement is internationally considered to be crucial for successful governance of nanotechnologies (NT), it has not necessarily been clear what the relationship is (or should be) between these engagement efforts and the more traditional governance practice of scientific risk assessment. This paper therefore carries out a literature review to capture and analyse how governance strategies have focused on public engagement for NT and how such engagement relates to processes of risk analysis. To further investigate these issues, we focus on a specific NT application as a case study: the use of nanoparticles for environmental remediation (nano-remediation). Through our review and analysis we find that the main approaches to incorporating public engagement into governance strategies have been the generation of a better understanding of public perceptions of NT and the setting of general research priorities. In the case of nano-remediation, we find that public engagement efforts have been extremely limited, even though this technology has been used in the field in several countries and highlighted as potentially problematic by others. Finally, we provide recommendations for improving the links between public engagement and risk assessment and specifically call for more work on the case of nano-remediation.",
    keywords = "Risk Governance, Public Engagement, Nanotechnology, Nano-Remediation, Emerging Technologies",
    author = "Grieger, {Khara Deanne} and Fern Wickson and Andersen, {Henning Boje} and Ortwin Renn",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "61–78",
    journal = "International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society",
    issn = "1835-8780",
    publisher = "Swinburne University of Technology * Faculty of Life & Social Sciences",

    }

    Improving Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies through Public Engagement: The Neglected Case of Nano-Remediation? / Grieger, Khara Deanne; Wickson, Fern; Andersen, Henning Boje; Renn, Ortwin.

    In: International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, Vol. 10, 2012, p. 61–78.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Improving Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies through Public Engagement: The Neglected Case of Nano-Remediation?

    AU - Grieger, Khara Deanne

    AU - Wickson, Fern

    AU - Andersen, Henning Boje

    AU - Renn, Ortwin

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - While public engagement is internationally considered to be crucial for successful governance of nanotechnologies (NT), it has not necessarily been clear what the relationship is (or should be) between these engagement efforts and the more traditional governance practice of scientific risk assessment. This paper therefore carries out a literature review to capture and analyse how governance strategies have focused on public engagement for NT and how such engagement relates to processes of risk analysis. To further investigate these issues, we focus on a specific NT application as a case study: the use of nanoparticles for environmental remediation (nano-remediation). Through our review and analysis we find that the main approaches to incorporating public engagement into governance strategies have been the generation of a better understanding of public perceptions of NT and the setting of general research priorities. In the case of nano-remediation, we find that public engagement efforts have been extremely limited, even though this technology has been used in the field in several countries and highlighted as potentially problematic by others. Finally, we provide recommendations for improving the links between public engagement and risk assessment and specifically call for more work on the case of nano-remediation.

    AB - While public engagement is internationally considered to be crucial for successful governance of nanotechnologies (NT), it has not necessarily been clear what the relationship is (or should be) between these engagement efforts and the more traditional governance practice of scientific risk assessment. This paper therefore carries out a literature review to capture and analyse how governance strategies have focused on public engagement for NT and how such engagement relates to processes of risk analysis. To further investigate these issues, we focus on a specific NT application as a case study: the use of nanoparticles for environmental remediation (nano-remediation). Through our review and analysis we find that the main approaches to incorporating public engagement into governance strategies have been the generation of a better understanding of public perceptions of NT and the setting of general research priorities. In the case of nano-remediation, we find that public engagement efforts have been extremely limited, even though this technology has been used in the field in several countries and highlighted as potentially problematic by others. Finally, we provide recommendations for improving the links between public engagement and risk assessment and specifically call for more work on the case of nano-remediation.

    KW - Risk Governance

    KW - Public Engagement

    KW - Nanotechnology

    KW - Nano-Remediation

    KW - Emerging Technologies

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 10

    SP - 61

    EP - 78

    JO - International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society

    JF - International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society

    SN - 1835-8780

    ER -