Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The performance of two new (1-day) culture methods, Salmonella Enrichment Broth (SEB) and Revive, and an alternative pre-enrichment broth, designated Universal pre-enrichment broth (UB), was compared to the internationally accepted buffered peptone water (BPW). The study was directed towards detection of Salmonella in 100 faecal samples from porcine and 100 neck-skin samples from poultry. The sensitivity (number of positive cases per method among all the positive cases) of the conventional pre-enrichment in BPW was found to be 0.77 for swine and 0.66 for poultry samples, while a combination of the BPW method with parallel pre-enrichment of the same sample in UB resulted in high sensitivity for swine (0.92) and poultry (0.95) samples. A 2-h pre-enrichment in the non-selective Revive, followed by overnight enrichment in selective broth, resulted in a low sensitivity, particularly for the neck-skin samples (0.16, P = 0.001). The SEE method in the porcine samples resulted in a sensitivity (0.71) comparable to the standard method (P = 0.31). In conclusion, additional pre-enrichment of samples in UB may substantially increase the culture sensitivity. During routine screening of large numbers of samples, it may be advantageous to use SEE rather than standard culturing. (C) 1998 Federation of European Microbiological Societies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalFEMS Microbiology Letters
Volume169
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)125-130
ISSN0378-1097
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Cite this

@article{32c5c3fe563e47818bc327eb9e011efc,
title = "Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry",
abstract = "The performance of two new (1-day) culture methods, Salmonella Enrichment Broth (SEB) and Revive, and an alternative pre-enrichment broth, designated Universal pre-enrichment broth (UB), was compared to the internationally accepted buffered peptone water (BPW). The study was directed towards detection of Salmonella in 100 faecal samples from porcine and 100 neck-skin samples from poultry. The sensitivity (number of positive cases per method among all the positive cases) of the conventional pre-enrichment in BPW was found to be 0.77 for swine and 0.66 for poultry samples, while a combination of the BPW method with parallel pre-enrichment of the same sample in UB resulted in high sensitivity for swine (0.92) and poultry (0.95) samples. A 2-h pre-enrichment in the non-selective Revive, followed by overnight enrichment in selective broth, resulted in a low sensitivity, particularly for the neck-skin samples (0.16, P = 0.001). The SEE method in the porcine samples resulted in a sensitivity (0.71) comparable to the standard method (P = 0.31). In conclusion, additional pre-enrichment of samples in UB may substantially increase the culture sensitivity. During routine screening of large numbers of samples, it may be advantageous to use SEE rather than standard culturing. (C) 1998 Federation of European Microbiological Societies.",
author = "Jeffrey Hoorfar and Baggesen, {Dorte Lau}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13308.x",
language = "English",
volume = "169",
pages = "125--130",
journal = "F E M S Microbiology Letters",
issn = "0378-1097",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry. / Hoorfar, Jeffrey; Baggesen, Dorte Lau.

In: FEMS Microbiology Letters, Vol. 169, No. 1, 1998, p. 125-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry

AU - Hoorfar, Jeffrey

AU - Baggesen, Dorte Lau

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The performance of two new (1-day) culture methods, Salmonella Enrichment Broth (SEB) and Revive, and an alternative pre-enrichment broth, designated Universal pre-enrichment broth (UB), was compared to the internationally accepted buffered peptone water (BPW). The study was directed towards detection of Salmonella in 100 faecal samples from porcine and 100 neck-skin samples from poultry. The sensitivity (number of positive cases per method among all the positive cases) of the conventional pre-enrichment in BPW was found to be 0.77 for swine and 0.66 for poultry samples, while a combination of the BPW method with parallel pre-enrichment of the same sample in UB resulted in high sensitivity for swine (0.92) and poultry (0.95) samples. A 2-h pre-enrichment in the non-selective Revive, followed by overnight enrichment in selective broth, resulted in a low sensitivity, particularly for the neck-skin samples (0.16, P = 0.001). The SEE method in the porcine samples resulted in a sensitivity (0.71) comparable to the standard method (P = 0.31). In conclusion, additional pre-enrichment of samples in UB may substantially increase the culture sensitivity. During routine screening of large numbers of samples, it may be advantageous to use SEE rather than standard culturing. (C) 1998 Federation of European Microbiological Societies.

AB - The performance of two new (1-day) culture methods, Salmonella Enrichment Broth (SEB) and Revive, and an alternative pre-enrichment broth, designated Universal pre-enrichment broth (UB), was compared to the internationally accepted buffered peptone water (BPW). The study was directed towards detection of Salmonella in 100 faecal samples from porcine and 100 neck-skin samples from poultry. The sensitivity (number of positive cases per method among all the positive cases) of the conventional pre-enrichment in BPW was found to be 0.77 for swine and 0.66 for poultry samples, while a combination of the BPW method with parallel pre-enrichment of the same sample in UB resulted in high sensitivity for swine (0.92) and poultry (0.95) samples. A 2-h pre-enrichment in the non-selective Revive, followed by overnight enrichment in selective broth, resulted in a low sensitivity, particularly for the neck-skin samples (0.16, P = 0.001). The SEE method in the porcine samples resulted in a sensitivity (0.71) comparable to the standard method (P = 0.31). In conclusion, additional pre-enrichment of samples in UB may substantially increase the culture sensitivity. During routine screening of large numbers of samples, it may be advantageous to use SEE rather than standard culturing. (C) 1998 Federation of European Microbiological Societies.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13308.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13308.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 169

SP - 125

EP - 130

JO - F E M S Microbiology Letters

JF - F E M S Microbiology Letters

SN - 0378-1097

IS - 1

ER -