How We (Sometimes Do Not) Evaluate Design Support: A Review of How Design Support Is Evaluated in Practice

Camilla Arndt Hansen, Ali Gürcan Özkil

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    31 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Design support can benefit practitioners, but it must be evaluated to increase the likelihood of adoption in industry. This study investigated how design support was evaluated in the papers presented at NordDesign 2018. The results indicate a skewed balance between research that understands design and research that supports it, as 65% of papers had a major focus on design support and 42% of papers introduced new support. Results also indicate a lack of evaluation and rigour in evaluation as only 44% of new support was evaluated and only half of these evaluated with intended users.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of NordDesign 2020
    EditorsN. H. Mortensen, C. T. Hansen, M. Deininger
    Number of pages12
    VolumeDS 101
    PublisherDesign Society
    Publication date2020
    ISBN (Electronic)9781912254088
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2020
    EventNordDesign 2020 - DTU-Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Duration: 12 Aug 202014 Aug 2020
    https://www.norddesign2020.dk/

    Conference

    ConferenceNordDesign 2020
    LocationDTU-Technical University of Denmark
    Country/TerritoryDenmark
    CityCopenhagen
    Period12/08/202014/08/2020
    Internet address

    Keywords

    • Design research
    • Design methods
    • Design support
    • Evaluation
    • Meta-research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How We (Sometimes Do Not) Evaluate Design Support: A Review of How Design Support Is Evaluated in Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this