Abstract
Food waste tracking systems (FWTS) have become increasingly common as monitoring tools in the food service sector. Yet, staff-reported FWTS data are subject to uncertainties from enumerator bias, and their accuracy has rarely been investigated or empirically tested. This study provides insights into the reliability of FWTS data from three healthcare kitchens and one hotel kitchen. Using a staggered experimental design, staff-reported data (≥ 21 days) were compared with scientific control data (6 days) collected with the same FWTS under constant conditions. Staff-reported FWTS data underestimated food waste quantities by up to 80 %, with an average underreporting of approx. 29.4 % across mealtimes (breakfast, lunch, dinner) in the healthcare kitchens and approx. 30.7 % during breakfast buffet in the hotel kitchen. Our results also show that staff-reported FWTS quantities can shift the true mean values toward a biased underestimation without widening the confidence interval, making comparisons appear precise but inaccurate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 108689 |
| Journal | Resources, Conservation and Recycling |
| Volume | 226 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISSN | 0921-3449 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2026 |
Keywords
- Food waste tracking
- Enumerator bias
- Accuracy
- Precision
- Underreporting
- Selfreporting
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How accurate are food waste tracking systems? Insights from healthcare and hotel kitchens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver