Health impact of substituting red meat by fish: addressing variability in risk-benefit assessments

Sofie Theresa Thomsen*, W. de Boer, Sara Monteiro Pires, B. Devleesschauwer, Sisse Fagt, Rikke Andersen, Morten Poulsen, H. van der Voet

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Sufficient intake of fish and limited red meat intake is commonly encouraged by national dietary guidelines to prevent various lifestyle diseases. One way to fulfill these guidelines would be to substitute red meat by fish. However, quantitative evidence of the public health gain of such substitution is lacking. Moreover, contaminants in these foods may compromise nutritional benefits. We aimed to estimate the health impact of substituting red meat by fish in the Danish diet in a risk-benefit assessment (RBA). Our study can support policy makers in defining evidence-based public health strategies.

Methods
We quantified the health impact of substituting red meat by fish among Danish adults in terms of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY) using data from a national dietary survey and food monitoring. We investigated the use of probabilistic methods to model variability in individual substitution behaviors and to assess health impact distributions in RBA of food.

Results
Health impact of the substitution varied largely by the type of fish consumed and by age and sex of the consumer. We estimated that 134 (95% uncertainty interval: 102; 169) DALYs/100,000 could be averted per year if a mix of lean and fatty fish is consumed in the Danish recommended amounts and intake of red meat decreased among Danish adults. The highest benefit was estimated for women in the childbearing age and for men above 50 years of age. However, a small fraction of women were assigned an overall health loss due to methylmercury exposure during pregnancy and the associated adverse effects in unborn children.

Conclusions
Our study estimated an overall health gain of substituting red meat by fish in the general Danish adult population, while providing insight in the variability in health impact at the level of individual consumers. Our approach can be applied in other RBAs and the results support the need for targeted public health strategies to ensure consumer health and safety.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberckz185.308
JournalEuropean Journal of Public Health
Volume29
Issue numberSupplement 4
Pages (from-to)117-118
ISSN1101-1262
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event12th European Public Health Conference : Building bridges for solidarity and public health - Marseille, France
Duration: 20 Nov 201923 Nov 2019
Conference number: 12

Conference

Conference12th European Public Health Conference
Number12
CountryFrance
CityMarseille
Period20/11/201923/11/2019

Cite this

@article{b4243cce79654ef5a9f069007c28e879,
title = "Health impact of substituting red meat by fish: addressing variability in risk-benefit assessments",
abstract = "BackgroundSufficient intake of fish and limited red meat intake is commonly encouraged by national dietary guidelines to prevent various lifestyle diseases. One way to fulfill these guidelines would be to substitute red meat by fish. However, quantitative evidence of the public health gain of such substitution is lacking. Moreover, contaminants in these foods may compromise nutritional benefits. We aimed to estimate the health impact of substituting red meat by fish in the Danish diet in a risk-benefit assessment (RBA). Our study can support policy makers in defining evidence-based public health strategies.MethodsWe quantified the health impact of substituting red meat by fish among Danish adults in terms of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY) using data from a national dietary survey and food monitoring. We investigated the use of probabilistic methods to model variability in individual substitution behaviors and to assess health impact distributions in RBA of food.ResultsHealth impact of the substitution varied largely by the type of fish consumed and by age and sex of the consumer. We estimated that 134 (95{\%} uncertainty interval: 102; 169) DALYs/100,000 could be averted per year if a mix of lean and fatty fish is consumed in the Danish recommended amounts and intake of red meat decreased among Danish adults. The highest benefit was estimated for women in the childbearing age and for men above 50 years of age. However, a small fraction of women were assigned an overall health loss due to methylmercury exposure during pregnancy and the associated adverse effects in unborn children.ConclusionsOur study estimated an overall health gain of substituting red meat by fish in the general Danish adult population, while providing insight in the variability in health impact at the level of individual consumers. Our approach can be applied in other RBAs and the results support the need for targeted public health strategies to ensure consumer health and safety.",
author = "Thomsen, {Sofie Theresa} and {de Boer}, W. and Pires, {Sara Monteiro} and B. Devleesschauwer and Sisse Fagt and Rikke Andersen and Morten Poulsen and {van der Voet}, H.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.308",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "117--118",
journal = "European Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1101-1262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "Supplement 4",

}

Health impact of substituting red meat by fish: addressing variability in risk-benefit assessments. / Thomsen, Sofie Theresa; de Boer, W.; Pires, Sara Monteiro; Devleesschauwer, B.; Fagt, Sisse; Andersen, Rikke; Poulsen, Morten; van der Voet, H.

In: European Journal of Public Health, Vol. 29, No. Supplement 4, ckz185.308, 2019, p. 117-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

TY - ABST

T1 - Health impact of substituting red meat by fish: addressing variability in risk-benefit assessments

AU - Thomsen, Sofie Theresa

AU - de Boer, W.

AU - Pires, Sara Monteiro

AU - Devleesschauwer, B.

AU - Fagt, Sisse

AU - Andersen, Rikke

AU - Poulsen, Morten

AU - van der Voet, H.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - BackgroundSufficient intake of fish and limited red meat intake is commonly encouraged by national dietary guidelines to prevent various lifestyle diseases. One way to fulfill these guidelines would be to substitute red meat by fish. However, quantitative evidence of the public health gain of such substitution is lacking. Moreover, contaminants in these foods may compromise nutritional benefits. We aimed to estimate the health impact of substituting red meat by fish in the Danish diet in a risk-benefit assessment (RBA). Our study can support policy makers in defining evidence-based public health strategies.MethodsWe quantified the health impact of substituting red meat by fish among Danish adults in terms of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY) using data from a national dietary survey and food monitoring. We investigated the use of probabilistic methods to model variability in individual substitution behaviors and to assess health impact distributions in RBA of food.ResultsHealth impact of the substitution varied largely by the type of fish consumed and by age and sex of the consumer. We estimated that 134 (95% uncertainty interval: 102; 169) DALYs/100,000 could be averted per year if a mix of lean and fatty fish is consumed in the Danish recommended amounts and intake of red meat decreased among Danish adults. The highest benefit was estimated for women in the childbearing age and for men above 50 years of age. However, a small fraction of women were assigned an overall health loss due to methylmercury exposure during pregnancy and the associated adverse effects in unborn children.ConclusionsOur study estimated an overall health gain of substituting red meat by fish in the general Danish adult population, while providing insight in the variability in health impact at the level of individual consumers. Our approach can be applied in other RBAs and the results support the need for targeted public health strategies to ensure consumer health and safety.

AB - BackgroundSufficient intake of fish and limited red meat intake is commonly encouraged by national dietary guidelines to prevent various lifestyle diseases. One way to fulfill these guidelines would be to substitute red meat by fish. However, quantitative evidence of the public health gain of such substitution is lacking. Moreover, contaminants in these foods may compromise nutritional benefits. We aimed to estimate the health impact of substituting red meat by fish in the Danish diet in a risk-benefit assessment (RBA). Our study can support policy makers in defining evidence-based public health strategies.MethodsWe quantified the health impact of substituting red meat by fish among Danish adults in terms of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY) using data from a national dietary survey and food monitoring. We investigated the use of probabilistic methods to model variability in individual substitution behaviors and to assess health impact distributions in RBA of food.ResultsHealth impact of the substitution varied largely by the type of fish consumed and by age and sex of the consumer. We estimated that 134 (95% uncertainty interval: 102; 169) DALYs/100,000 could be averted per year if a mix of lean and fatty fish is consumed in the Danish recommended amounts and intake of red meat decreased among Danish adults. The highest benefit was estimated for women in the childbearing age and for men above 50 years of age. However, a small fraction of women were assigned an overall health loss due to methylmercury exposure during pregnancy and the associated adverse effects in unborn children.ConclusionsOur study estimated an overall health gain of substituting red meat by fish in the general Danish adult population, while providing insight in the variability in health impact at the level of individual consumers. Our approach can be applied in other RBAs and the results support the need for targeted public health strategies to ensure consumer health and safety.

U2 - 10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.308

DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.308

M3 - Conference abstract in journal

VL - 29

SP - 117

EP - 118

JO - European Journal of Public Health

JF - European Journal of Public Health

SN - 1101-1262

IS - Supplement 4

M1 - ckz185.308

ER -