Hazard ontology and 4D benchmark model for facilitation of automated construction safety requirement analysis

Karsten W. Johansen*, Carl Schultz, Jochen Teizer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

96 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Over the last two decades, numerous approaches have been developed for automating construction safety assessment, that is, prevention through design and planning (PtD/P), that overcome the limitations of a purely manual safety assessment process. Despite this, such automated approaches are yet to be widely adopted in practice. Barriers include a lack of standardization of construction safety concepts within regulatory frameworks and a lack of confidence in automated approaches on the part of practitioners. This work presents a freely available 4D BIM-based benchmark model (3D Building Information Model and 68 schedules) and construction safety ontology covering the two most frequent and severe construction site accidents: falls from height and struck-by falling object hazards. The benchmark model and ontology enable the construction safety community to test and compare the performance of alternative automated approaches. Moreover, they are utilized in our PtD/P tool SafeConAI, and empirical evaluation results show how the safety situation changes among different construction schedules of the same project.

Original languageEnglish
JournalComputer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
Volume38
Issue number15
Pages (from-to)2128-2144
ISSN1093-9687
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The research presented in this paper has been funded by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement nos. 958398 and 958310.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hazard ontology and 4D benchmark model for facilitation of automated construction safety requirement analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this