Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Guidelines for Evaluating Artificial Light to Mitigate Unwanted Fisheries Bycatch

  • Noëlle Yochum*
  • , Junita D. Karlsen
  • , Jesse F. Senko
  • , John H. Wang
  • , Valentina Melli
  • , Michele Luca Geraci
  • , Anne Christine Utne-Palm
  • , Michael Breen
  • , Elsa Cuende
  • , Shannon M. Bayse
  • , Jasmine Somerville
  • , Andreas Hermann
  • , Alexius Edridge
  • , Emma K. Mackenzie
  • , Peter Ljungberg
  • , Jérôme Chladek
  • , Mattias Van Opstal
  • , Dan Watson
  • , Mark J.M. Lomeli
  • , Martin Oliver
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Institute of Marine Research
  • Arizona State University
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • AZTI
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland
  • Johann Heinrich von Thunen Institute
  • University of Exeter
  • Scottish Government
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • Research Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries
  • Safetynet Technologies Limited
  • Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission
  • Bord Iascaigh Mhara

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

258 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

Evaluating artificial light as a bycatch reduction device (bycatch reduction light, “BRL”) requires a multidisciplinary approach that applies knowledge of fisheries science, fishing technology, engineering, physics, optics, vision biology, oceanography, animal behavior, economics, and social science. To support the continued evaluation of BRL, these guidelines were developed for conducting standardized and systematic studies. The guidelines highlight how information from those fields of study contributes to the efficacy of study design and the evaluation of results. The guidance is focused on four core areas: (i) defining the objective of using a BRL; (ii) understanding the context in which the BRL is applied and considering the base knowledge that is needed; (iii) selecting an appropriate study design (including selection and placement of the BRL) and analytical methods for measuring both behavioral responses and catch outcomes from using the BRL; and (iv) interpreting the data through the lens of the base knowledge, context, and study design, and evaluating the results against an established definition of success and variables that affect adoption. The purpose of these guidelines is to increase the ability of researchers and managers to determine if BRL is appropriate for a fishery and to encourage consistency in data collection among studies to support future meta-analyses and inter-study comparison. In addition, suggestions are provided on where more research and technology development are needed to support this rapidly emerging field of research.
Original languageEnglish
JournalReviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture
Volume32
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)612-656
ISSN2330-8249
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Fish behavior
  • Fish selectivity
  • Fish vision
  • Phototaxis
  • Bycatch reduction
  • Conservation engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guidelines for Evaluating Artificial Light to Mitigate Unwanted Fisheries Bycatch'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this