Green hydrogen production pathways: Comparative insights from Denmark, the United States, and China

  • Elisabeth Andreae*
  • , Yuanbei F. Fan
  • , Marianne Petersen
  • , Shi You
  • , Henrik W. Bindner
  • , Mark Z. Jacobson
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In the pursuit of reducing carbon emissions in hard-to-decarbonize sectors such as heavy industry and shipping, power-to-hydrogen technology offers a promising pathway. The technology uses water electrolysis to convert renewable energy into hydrogen, which can then be used directly as hydrogen fuel with a fuel cell to produce electricity for transportation or grid balancing or used for steel, ammonia, and methanol production. This study evaluates and compares power-to-hydrogen systems by examining system scale, geographical conditions, design choices, configuration, operational strategies, and other key factors critical in shaping system performance. Efficiency and cost are assessed as separate but related aspects influencing the overall viability of green electrolyzer systems (electrolyzers powered by clean, renewable electricity). The analysis of power-to-hydrogen systems in Denmark, the United States, and China reveals variations in costs, technological approaches, and strategic implementations across these regions. The comparative evaluation shows that the economic viability of these systems is largely driven by design choices and operational strategies. The findings highlight that customizing power-to-hydrogen systems to local conditions is essential for achieving optimal cost-effectiveness.
Original languageEnglish
Article number120065
JournalEnergy Conversion and Management
Volume342
Number of pages12
ISSN0196-8904
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Power-to-X
  • System design
  • Operation principle
  • Case based analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Green hydrogen production pathways: Comparative insights from Denmark, the United States, and China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this