Giving current and future generations a real voice: a practical method for constructing sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal

Yannick Cornet, Merrill Jones Barradale, Michael Bruhn Barfod, Robin Hickman

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    89 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Decisions to invest in large-scale transport projects typically extend beyond traditional cost- benefit analysis. Multi-criteria analysis methods such as multi-actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA) have been proposed to assess wider economic effects and long-term environmental impacts from various stakeholder perspectives. However, there is no standard practice for appraising transport projects against sustainable development objectives. In order to give future generations a voice in decisions that will impact them, this paper extends the MAMCA methodology to make various actors and a "sustainability viewpoint" explicit. A dual-approach method for constructing sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal is proposed. The method juxtaposes an expert-based approach with a principle-based approach. In the former, sustainability experts are asked to prioritise criteria for project assessment. In the latter, criteria weights are calculated based on sustainability theory ("strong" and "weak" sustainability). Together, these viewpoints are intended to inform decision-making. The appraisal of HS2 Phase I, a high-speed rail project in the UK, is used to demonstrate the proposed method. It is found that all three variants of the sustainability viewpoint result in project preferences that are similar to each other, but different from those of other transport professionals. The paper concludes by arguing for the explicit inclusion and triangulation of sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal on a multi-actor basis. One practical recommendation from the MAMCA process is the need to hire more transport planners with sustainability experience into government planning agencies.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEuropean Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
    Volume18
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)316-339
    ISSN1567-7141
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Cite this

    @article{77f1d30857964a8897ca3a0f0b8f247c,
    title = "Giving current and future generations a real voice: a practical method for constructing sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal",
    abstract = "Decisions to invest in large-scale transport projects typically extend beyond traditional cost- benefit analysis. Multi-criteria analysis methods such as multi-actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA) have been proposed to assess wider economic effects and long-term environmental impacts from various stakeholder perspectives. However, there is no standard practice for appraising transport projects against sustainable development objectives. In order to give future generations a voice in decisions that will impact them, this paper extends the MAMCA methodology to make various actors and a {"}sustainability viewpoint{"} explicit. A dual-approach method for constructing sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal is proposed. The method juxtaposes an expert-based approach with a principle-based approach. In the former, sustainability experts are asked to prioritise criteria for project assessment. In the latter, criteria weights are calculated based on sustainability theory ({"}strong{"} and {"}weak{"} sustainability). Together, these viewpoints are intended to inform decision-making. The appraisal of HS2 Phase I, a high-speed rail project in the UK, is used to demonstrate the proposed method. It is found that all three variants of the sustainability viewpoint result in project preferences that are similar to each other, but different from those of other transport professionals. The paper concludes by arguing for the explicit inclusion and triangulation of sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal on a multi-actor basis. One practical recommendation from the MAMCA process is the need to hire more transport planners with sustainability experience into government planning agencies.",
    author = "Yannick Cornet and Barradale, {Merrill Jones} and Barfod, {Michael Bruhn} and Robin Hickman",
    year = "2018",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "316--339",
    journal = "European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research",
    issn = "1567-7141",
    publisher = "Technische Universiteit Delft",
    number = "3",

    }

    Giving current and future generations a real voice: a practical method for constructing sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal. / Cornet, Yannick; Barradale, Merrill Jones; Barfod, Michael Bruhn; Hickman, Robin.

    In: European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2018, p. 316-339.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Giving current and future generations a real voice: a practical method for constructing sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal

    AU - Cornet, Yannick

    AU - Barradale, Merrill Jones

    AU - Barfod, Michael Bruhn

    AU - Hickman, Robin

    PY - 2018

    Y1 - 2018

    N2 - Decisions to invest in large-scale transport projects typically extend beyond traditional cost- benefit analysis. Multi-criteria analysis methods such as multi-actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA) have been proposed to assess wider economic effects and long-term environmental impacts from various stakeholder perspectives. However, there is no standard practice for appraising transport projects against sustainable development objectives. In order to give future generations a voice in decisions that will impact them, this paper extends the MAMCA methodology to make various actors and a "sustainability viewpoint" explicit. A dual-approach method for constructing sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal is proposed. The method juxtaposes an expert-based approach with a principle-based approach. In the former, sustainability experts are asked to prioritise criteria for project assessment. In the latter, criteria weights are calculated based on sustainability theory ("strong" and "weak" sustainability). Together, these viewpoints are intended to inform decision-making. The appraisal of HS2 Phase I, a high-speed rail project in the UK, is used to demonstrate the proposed method. It is found that all three variants of the sustainability viewpoint result in project preferences that are similar to each other, but different from those of other transport professionals. The paper concludes by arguing for the explicit inclusion and triangulation of sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal on a multi-actor basis. One practical recommendation from the MAMCA process is the need to hire more transport planners with sustainability experience into government planning agencies.

    AB - Decisions to invest in large-scale transport projects typically extend beyond traditional cost- benefit analysis. Multi-criteria analysis methods such as multi-actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA) have been proposed to assess wider economic effects and long-term environmental impacts from various stakeholder perspectives. However, there is no standard practice for appraising transport projects against sustainable development objectives. In order to give future generations a voice in decisions that will impact them, this paper extends the MAMCA methodology to make various actors and a "sustainability viewpoint" explicit. A dual-approach method for constructing sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal is proposed. The method juxtaposes an expert-based approach with a principle-based approach. In the former, sustainability experts are asked to prioritise criteria for project assessment. In the latter, criteria weights are calculated based on sustainability theory ("strong" and "weak" sustainability). Together, these viewpoints are intended to inform decision-making. The appraisal of HS2 Phase I, a high-speed rail project in the UK, is used to demonstrate the proposed method. It is found that all three variants of the sustainability viewpoint result in project preferences that are similar to each other, but different from those of other transport professionals. The paper concludes by arguing for the explicit inclusion and triangulation of sustainability viewpoints in transport appraisal on a multi-actor basis. One practical recommendation from the MAMCA process is the need to hire more transport planners with sustainability experience into government planning agencies.

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 18

    SP - 316

    EP - 339

    JO - European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research

    JF - European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research

    SN - 1567-7141

    IS - 3

    ER -