Abstract
Advances in automation have facilitated the widespread adoption of highthroughput
vapour-diffusion methods for initial crystallization screening.
However, for many proteins, screening thousands of crystallization conditions
fails to yield crystals of sufficient quality for structural characterization. Here,
the rates of crystal identification for thaumatin, catalase and myoglobin using
microfluidic Crystal Former devices and sitting-drop vapour-diffusion plates are
compared. It is shown that the Crystal Former results in a greater number
of identified initial crystallization conditions compared with vapour diffusion.
Furthermore, crystals of thaumatin and lysozyme obtained in the Crystal Former
were used directly for structure determination both in situ and upon harvesting
and cryocooling. On the basis of these results, a crystallization strategy is
proposed that uses multiple methods with distinct kinetic trajectories through
the protein phase diagram to increase the output of crystallization pipelines.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Acta Crystallographica. Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications Online |
Volume | 67 |
Issue number | 8 |
Pages (from-to) | 971-975 |
Number of pages | 5 |
ISSN | 2053-230X |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Crystal Former
- Protein crystallization
- Structural biology
- Liquid-liquid diffusion
- Microfluidics