Frames, agency and institutional change: the case of benchmarking in Danish construction

Grane Mikael Gregaard Rasmussen, Per Langaa Jensen, Stefan Christoffer Gottlieb

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study examines change and the sources influencing the formulation and diffusion of policies in construction. The change examined is the introduction of a benchmarking policy initiative in the Danish construction industry. Using institutional theory with emphasis on the concepts of frames and framings, we show how strategically motivated actors are able to frame policy problems in ways that disclose the mixture of motives, interests and institutional mechanisms at play in change processes. In doing so, we contribute to the literature on the role of agency in institutional change and the framing of policy problems. We conclude by highlighting how insights gained from the framing perspective present a challenge to the dominant comprehensive rationalist view of the policy process and the formulation and implementation of reform initiatives.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalConstruction Management and Economics
    Volume35
    Issue number6
    Pages (from-to)305-323
    Number of pages19
    ISSN0144-6193
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Keywords

    • Benchmarking
    • Construction reform
    • Frames
    • Institutional theory
    • Policy Design

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Frames, agency and institutional change: the case of benchmarking in Danish construction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this