Frames, agency and institutional change

the case of benchmarking in Danish construction

Grane Mikael Gregaard Rasmussen, Per Langaa Jensen, Stefan Christoffer Gottlieb

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study examines change and the sources influencing the formulation and diffusion of policies in construction. The change examined is the introduction of a benchmarking policy initiative in the Danish construction industry. Using institutional theory with emphasis on the concepts of frames and framings, we show how strategically motivated actors are able to frame policy problems in ways that disclose the mixture of motives, interests and institutional mechanisms at play in change processes. In doing so, we contribute to the literature on the role of agency in institutional change and the framing of policy problems. We conclude by highlighting how insights gained from the framing perspective present a challenge to the dominant comprehensive rationalist view of the policy process and the formulation and implementation of reform initiatives.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalConstruction Management and Economics
    Volume35
    Issue number6
    Pages (from-to)305-323
    Number of pages19
    ISSN0144-6193
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Keywords

    • Benchmarking
    • Construction reform
    • Frames
    • Institutional theory
    • Policy Design

    Cite this

    Rasmussen, Grane Mikael Gregaard ; Jensen, Per Langaa ; Gottlieb, Stefan Christoffer. / Frames, agency and institutional change : the case of benchmarking in Danish construction. In: Construction Management and Economics. 2017 ; Vol. 35, No. 6. pp. 305-323.
    @article{3ed7c5d6ebde45aba2cb827e2f6228c5,
    title = "Frames, agency and institutional change: the case of benchmarking in Danish construction",
    abstract = "This study examines change and the sources influencing the formulation and diffusion of policies in construction. The change examined is the introduction of a benchmarking policy initiative in the Danish construction industry. Using institutional theory with emphasis on the concepts of frames and framings, we show how strategically motivated actors are able to frame policy problems in ways that disclose the mixture of motives, interests and institutional mechanisms at play in change processes. In doing so, we contribute to the literature on the role of agency in institutional change and the framing of policy problems. We conclude by highlighting how insights gained from the framing perspective present a challenge to the dominant comprehensive rationalist view of the policy process and the formulation and implementation of reform initiatives.",
    keywords = "Benchmarking, Construction reform, Frames, Institutional theory, Policy Design",
    author = "Rasmussen, {Grane Mikael Gregaard} and Jensen, {Per Langaa} and Gottlieb, {Stefan Christoffer}",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1080/01446193.2017.1298824",
    language = "English",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "305--323",
    journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
    issn = "0144-6193",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "6",

    }

    Frames, agency and institutional change : the case of benchmarking in Danish construction. / Rasmussen, Grane Mikael Gregaard; Jensen, Per Langaa; Gottlieb, Stefan Christoffer.

    In: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2017, p. 305-323.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Frames, agency and institutional change

    T2 - the case of benchmarking in Danish construction

    AU - Rasmussen, Grane Mikael Gregaard

    AU - Jensen, Per Langaa

    AU - Gottlieb, Stefan Christoffer

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - This study examines change and the sources influencing the formulation and diffusion of policies in construction. The change examined is the introduction of a benchmarking policy initiative in the Danish construction industry. Using institutional theory with emphasis on the concepts of frames and framings, we show how strategically motivated actors are able to frame policy problems in ways that disclose the mixture of motives, interests and institutional mechanisms at play in change processes. In doing so, we contribute to the literature on the role of agency in institutional change and the framing of policy problems. We conclude by highlighting how insights gained from the framing perspective present a challenge to the dominant comprehensive rationalist view of the policy process and the formulation and implementation of reform initiatives.

    AB - This study examines change and the sources influencing the formulation and diffusion of policies in construction. The change examined is the introduction of a benchmarking policy initiative in the Danish construction industry. Using institutional theory with emphasis on the concepts of frames and framings, we show how strategically motivated actors are able to frame policy problems in ways that disclose the mixture of motives, interests and institutional mechanisms at play in change processes. In doing so, we contribute to the literature on the role of agency in institutional change and the framing of policy problems. We conclude by highlighting how insights gained from the framing perspective present a challenge to the dominant comprehensive rationalist view of the policy process and the formulation and implementation of reform initiatives.

    KW - Benchmarking

    KW - Construction reform

    KW - Frames

    KW - Institutional theory

    KW - Policy Design

    U2 - 10.1080/01446193.2017.1298824

    DO - 10.1080/01446193.2017.1298824

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 35

    SP - 305

    EP - 323

    JO - Construction Management and Economics

    JF - Construction Management and Economics

    SN - 0144-6193

    IS - 6

    ER -