Abstract
Prey size spectra of suspension-feeding zooplankton may be predicted from foraging mode and a mechanistic understanding of prey perception and capture. I examine this for suspension-feeding copepods where 2 foraging modes can be distinguished: ambush feeding and active (i.e. cruising and feeding-current) feeding. Prey perception mechanisms differ between the 2 foraging modes. I use simple arguments to predict that the ambush strategy targets larger prey and has a narrower prey size spectrum than the cruising and feeding-current feeding strategies. I compile data from the literature that confirm the prediction. I also make qualitative predictions of food size spectra in zooplankton with other prey perception mechanisms that accord with observations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Marine Ecology Progress Series |
| Volume | 558 |
| Pages (from-to) | 15-20 |
| ISSN | 1616-1599 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
Keywords
- ECOLOGY
- MARINE
- OCEANOGRAPHY
- PLANKTON
- SELECTIVITY
- PERCEPTION
- MECHANISMS
- MORPHOLOGY
- PATTERNS
- CAPTURE
- SIGNALS
- GROWTH
- RATES
- Prey perception mechanism
- Prey capture mechanism
- Pelagic tunicates
- Heterotrophic flagellates
- Dinoflagellates
- Cladocerans
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Foraging mode and prey size spectra of suspension-feeding copepods and other zooplankton'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver