Abstract
Nanoporous anodic aluminum oxides
(AAOs) are used as templates
in various technological applications, including load-bearing aircraft
structures. But in spite of their popularity, the important aspects
that control their (dis-)bonding to an organic coating are not fully
understood. To study the mechanisms behind the negative effect of
fluorides on AAOs adhesion we employed both porous and barrier AAO
specimens. These were prepared by anodizing in sulfuric acid (SAA)
or a mixture of phosphoric and sulfuric acids (PSA), with and without
postanodizing immersion in NaF. Experimental results indicate that
chemical surface modifications, as concluded from X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry, are
dependent on the initial oxide composition. A partial replacement
of surface hydroxyls (OH) by fluorine on SAA leads to adhesion loss
due to removal of these stable sites for oxide-to-adhesive interfacial
bonding. Conversely, fluoride-induced dissolution of surface phosphates
in PSA compensates for fluoride adsorption by revealing new OH groups.
As the net OH fraction remains similar there is no further adhesion
loss under water-ingress. The surprising reduction of dry adhesion
is contributed to an interplay between surface energy changes affecting
the type of attractive forces across the interface, as well as the
loss of fine surface features, as seen by transmission electron microscopy
cross-section images.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | ACS Applied Nano Materials |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Pages (from-to) | 6139-6149 |
| ISSN | 2574-0970 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- Aluminum
- Anodizing
- Adhesion
- Fluorides
- Nanotemplates
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fluoride-Induced Interfacial Adhesion Loss of Nanoporous Anodic Aluminum Oxide Templates in Aerospace Structures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver