Extending the hydrophobic cavity of β-cyclodextrin results in more negative heat capacity changes but reduced binding affinities

Christian Schönbeck, René Holm, Peter Westh, Günther H.J. Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The formation of inclusion complexes of hydroxypropylated β-cyclodextrins (CDs) with three bile salts are investigated to shed light on the role played by the hydroxypropyl (HP) substituents. The HP-chains are situated at the rim of the CD and may thus extend the hydrophobic cavity of the CD. Calorimetric titrations in a broad temperature range and molecular dynamics simulations confirm previous speculations that the HP-chains cause an increase in dehydrated nonpolar surface area upon formation of the complexes. This additional burial of nonpolar surface area, 12–16 Å2 per HP-chain according to the MD simulations, results in more negative values of ΔC p °, which are in quantitative agreement with what is expected for hydrophobic dehydration. Although these observations support the picture of an extended hydrophobic cavity, HPβCD complexes were less stable than their unsubstituted counterparts. This indicates that increased hydrophobic contacts are not always accompanied by increased binding strength. The linear dependence of ΔC p °, ΔH° and ΔS° on the number of HP-chains give rise to isoentropic and isoenthalpic temperatures at which ΔH° and ΔS° are independent of the number of HP-chains on the host CD (but depend on the type of bile salt). Interestingly, these convergence temperatures are close to what is observed for unfolding of proteins and may be a common feature of hydrophobic dehydration.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry
Volume78
Issue number1-4
Pages (from-to)351-361
Number of pages11
ISSN1388-3127
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extending the hydrophobic cavity of β-cyclodextrin results in more negative heat capacity changes but reduced binding affinities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this