Abstract
Graphical passwords (GPs) that authenticate users using images are considered as one potential alternative to overcome the issues of traditional textual passwords. Based on the idea of utilizing an extremely large image, map-based GPs like PassMap and GeoPass have been developed, where users can select their secrets (geographical points) on a world map. In particular, PassMap allows users to select two locations on a map, while GeoPass reduces the number of locations to only one. At first glance, selecting one location is more vulnerable to attacks, while increasing the location number may add burden on users. In the literature, there is no research exploring this issue. Motivated by this, our purpose in this work is to explore the effect of location number (the number of geographical points) and compare two schemes of PassMap and GeoPass in terms of users’ performance and feedback. In this work, we develop a generic and open platform for realizing map-based schemes, and conduct a user study with 60 participants. The study reveals that selecting two locations would not degrade the scheme performance. Our effort aims to complement exiting research studies in this area.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Information Security and Privacy |
Volume | 10343 |
Publisher | Springer |
Publication date | 2017 |
Pages | 301-313 |
ISBN (Print) | 9783319598697 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Event | 22nd Australasian Conference - Massey University Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Duration: 3 Jul 2017 → 5 Jul 2017 Conference number: 22 |
Conference
Conference | 22nd Australasian Conference |
---|---|
Number | 22 |
Location | Massey University Auckland |
Country/Territory | New Zealand |
City | Auckland |
Period | 03/07/2017 → 05/07/2017 |
Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
---|---|
Volume | 10343 |
ISSN | 0302-9743 |
Keywords
- User authentication
- Graphical passwords
- Map-based password authentication
- Geographical location
- Security and usability