Experimental comparison of the dynamic evaporator response using homogeneous and slip flow modeling

Martin Ryhl Kærn (Invited author), Brian Elmegaard (Invited author), Lars Finn Sloth Larsen (Invited author)

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    458 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The dynamic response from an evaporator is important for control of refrigeration and air-conditioning systems. Essentially, the prediction of refrigerant charge inside the evaporator is crucial for the dynamic behavior. The prediction of refrigerant charge follows from suitable void fraction correlations from the literature. A chosen set of void fraction correlations (slip flow) and the assumption of homogeneous flow will be investigated in this paper and compared to experiments on a simple coaxial type evaporator. The numerical model of the evaporator is a dynamic distributed mixture model, where different void fraction correlations can be applied. It is shown that the dynamic response of the homogeneous model is too fast, whereas the slip flow models agree well with the experiments. Another difference is that the charge prediction of the homogeneous model is approximately 2-3 times less than the slip flow models.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationModelica 2011
    PublisherModelica Association
    Publication date2011
    Publication statusPublished - 2011
    Event8th International Modelica Conference - Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Duration: 1 Jan 2011 → …
    Conference number: 8

    Conference

    Conference8th International Modelica Conference
    Number8
    LocationTechnische Universität Dresden
    Country/TerritoryGermany
    CityDresden
    Period01/01/2011 → …

    Keywords

    • Transient
    • Air-conditioning
    • Refrigeration
    • Evaporator
    • Dynamic;
    • Two-phase flow
    • Simulation
    • Modelica
    • Modeling

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental comparison of the dynamic evaporator response using homogeneous and slip flow modeling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this