Abstract
In this study, the task of evaluating research projects’ relevance and scientific quality is addressed, and a pilot study is
executed for five Danish food and agricultural research programmes. Literature reviewed emphasises the importance of
context, of consistency and transparency and of the cost of evaluation. Moreover, the purpose of research evaluation is
thoroughly examined. The method developed and implemented addresses each of these concerns, particularly by employing
simple measures and by complementing quantitative analysis with qualitative exercises featuring structured stakeholder
interviews. The results of the pilot indicate substantial variation between projects within programmes, and some evidence of
size-performance relationships.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C - Food Economics |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 3 |
Pages (from-to) | 127-141 |
ISSN | 1650-7541 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Evaluation methods
- agricultural research
- cost effectiveness
- research impact