Evaluation of pre-PCR processing approaches for enumeration of Salmonella enterica in naturally contaminated animal feed

Jenny Schelin, Gunnar Andersson, Håkan Vigre, Börje Norling, Per Häggblom, Jeffrey Hoorfar, Peter Rådström, Charlotta Löfström

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Three pre‐PCR processing strategies for the detection and/or quantification of Salmonella in naturally contaminated soya bean meal were evaluated. Methods included: (i) flotation‐qPCR [enumeration of intact Salmonella cells prior to quantitative PCR (qPCR)], (ii) MPN‐PCR (modified most probable number method combined with qPCR) and (iii) qualitative culture enrichment PCR. The limit of quantification was 1·8 × 102 CFU g−1 (flotation‐qPCR) and 0·02 MPN g−1 (MPN‐PCR). Fifteen naturally contaminated Salmonella positive soya bean meal samples from one lot were analysed in parallel with the three methods, using 2·5, 50 and 25 g of feed, respectively, resulting in detection of Salmonella in 6, 15 and 9 bags. Enumeration resulted in 1·8 × 102–7·8 × 103 CFU g−1 (flotation‐qPCR) and 0·024 to >5·2 MPN g−1 (MPN‐PCR). Except for differences in methodology, results obtained with the three techniques could be due to the presence of nonculturable Salmonella and/or a heterogeneous distribution of Salmonella in the material. The evaluated methods provide different possibilities to assess the prevalence of Salmonella in feed, together with the numbers of culturable, as well as nonculturable cells, and can be applied to generate data to allow more accurate quantitative microbial risk assessment for Salmonella in the feed chain.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Applied Microbiology
Volume116
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)167-178
ISSN1364-5072
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Salmonella
  • Animal feed
  • Buoyant density
  • Food safety
  • Most probable number
  • Quantitative PCR

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of pre-PCR processing approaches for enumeration of Salmonella enterica in naturally contaminated animal feed'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this