Evaluation of life cycle inventory data for recycling systems

Line Kai-Sørensen Brogaard, Anders Damgaard, Morten Bang Jensen, Morton Barlaz, Thomas Højlund Christensen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

912 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper reviews databases on material recycling (primary as well as secondary production) used in life cycle assessments (LCA) of waste management systems. A total of 366 datasets, from 1980 to 2010 and covering 14 materials, were collected from databases and reports. Totals for CO2-equivalent emissions were compared to illustrate variations in the data. It was hypothesised that emissions from material production and the recycling industry had decreased over time due to increasing regulation, energy costs and process optimisation, but the reported datasets did not reveal such a general trend. Data representing the same processes varied considerably between databases, and proper background information was hard to obtain, which in turn made it difficult to explain the large differences observed. Those differences between the highest and lowest estimated CO2 emissions (equivalents) from the primary production of newsprint, HDPE and glass were 238%, 443% and 452%, respectively. For steel and aluminium the differences were 1761% and 235%, respectively. There is a severe lack of data for some recycled materials; for example, only one dataset existed for secondary cardboard. The study shows that the choice of dataset used to represent the environmental load of a material recycling process and credited emissions from the avoided production of virgin materials is crucial for the outcome of an LCA on waste management. Great care and a high degree of transparency are mandatory, but advice on which datasets to use could not be determined from the study. However, from the gathered data, recycling in general showed lower emission of CO2 per kg material than primary production, so the recycling of materials (considered in this study) is thus beneficial in most cases.

Original languageEnglish
JournalResources, Conservation and Recycling
Volume87
Pages (from-to)30-45
ISSN0921-3449
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

Brogaard, Line Kai-Sørensen ; Damgaard, Anders ; Jensen, Morten Bang ; Barlaz, Morton ; Christensen, Thomas Højlund. / Evaluation of life cycle inventory data for recycling systems. In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2014 ; Vol. 87. pp. 30-45.
@article{5225d512d49d463aaec9a01f0a606c59,
title = "Evaluation of life cycle inventory data for recycling systems",
abstract = "This paper reviews databases on material recycling (primary as well as secondary production) used in life cycle assessments (LCA) of waste management systems. A total of 366 datasets, from 1980 to 2010 and covering 14 materials, were collected from databases and reports. Totals for CO2-equivalent emissions were compared to illustrate variations in the data. It was hypothesised that emissions from material production and the recycling industry had decreased over time due to increasing regulation, energy costs and process optimisation, but the reported datasets did not reveal such a general trend. Data representing the same processes varied considerably between databases, and proper background information was hard to obtain, which in turn made it difficult to explain the large differences observed. Those differences between the highest and lowest estimated CO2 emissions (equivalents) from the primary production of newsprint, HDPE and glass were 238{\%}, 443{\%} and 452{\%}, respectively. For steel and aluminium the differences were 1761{\%} and 235{\%}, respectively. There is a severe lack of data for some recycled materials; for example, only one dataset existed for secondary cardboard. The study shows that the choice of dataset used to represent the environmental load of a material recycling process and credited emissions from the avoided production of virgin materials is crucial for the outcome of an LCA on waste management. Great care and a high degree of transparency are mandatory, but advice on which datasets to use could not be determined from the study. However, from the gathered data, recycling in general showed lower emission of CO2 per kg material than primary production, so the recycling of materials (considered in this study) is thus beneficial in most cases.",
author = "Brogaard, {Line Kai-S{\o}rensen} and Anders Damgaard and Jensen, {Morten Bang} and Morton Barlaz and Christensen, {Thomas H{\o}jlund}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.03.011",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "30--45",
journal = "Resources, Conservation and Recycling",
issn = "0921-3449",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Evaluation of life cycle inventory data for recycling systems. / Brogaard, Line Kai-Sørensen; Damgaard, Anders; Jensen, Morten Bang; Barlaz, Morton ; Christensen, Thomas Højlund.

In: Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 87, 2014, p. 30-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of life cycle inventory data for recycling systems

AU - Brogaard, Line Kai-Sørensen

AU - Damgaard, Anders

AU - Jensen, Morten Bang

AU - Barlaz, Morton

AU - Christensen, Thomas Højlund

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper reviews databases on material recycling (primary as well as secondary production) used in life cycle assessments (LCA) of waste management systems. A total of 366 datasets, from 1980 to 2010 and covering 14 materials, were collected from databases and reports. Totals for CO2-equivalent emissions were compared to illustrate variations in the data. It was hypothesised that emissions from material production and the recycling industry had decreased over time due to increasing regulation, energy costs and process optimisation, but the reported datasets did not reveal such a general trend. Data representing the same processes varied considerably between databases, and proper background information was hard to obtain, which in turn made it difficult to explain the large differences observed. Those differences between the highest and lowest estimated CO2 emissions (equivalents) from the primary production of newsprint, HDPE and glass were 238%, 443% and 452%, respectively. For steel and aluminium the differences were 1761% and 235%, respectively. There is a severe lack of data for some recycled materials; for example, only one dataset existed for secondary cardboard. The study shows that the choice of dataset used to represent the environmental load of a material recycling process and credited emissions from the avoided production of virgin materials is crucial for the outcome of an LCA on waste management. Great care and a high degree of transparency are mandatory, but advice on which datasets to use could not be determined from the study. However, from the gathered data, recycling in general showed lower emission of CO2 per kg material than primary production, so the recycling of materials (considered in this study) is thus beneficial in most cases.

AB - This paper reviews databases on material recycling (primary as well as secondary production) used in life cycle assessments (LCA) of waste management systems. A total of 366 datasets, from 1980 to 2010 and covering 14 materials, were collected from databases and reports. Totals for CO2-equivalent emissions were compared to illustrate variations in the data. It was hypothesised that emissions from material production and the recycling industry had decreased over time due to increasing regulation, energy costs and process optimisation, but the reported datasets did not reveal such a general trend. Data representing the same processes varied considerably between databases, and proper background information was hard to obtain, which in turn made it difficult to explain the large differences observed. Those differences between the highest and lowest estimated CO2 emissions (equivalents) from the primary production of newsprint, HDPE and glass were 238%, 443% and 452%, respectively. For steel and aluminium the differences were 1761% and 235%, respectively. There is a severe lack of data for some recycled materials; for example, only one dataset existed for secondary cardboard. The study shows that the choice of dataset used to represent the environmental load of a material recycling process and credited emissions from the avoided production of virgin materials is crucial for the outcome of an LCA on waste management. Great care and a high degree of transparency are mandatory, but advice on which datasets to use could not be determined from the study. However, from the gathered data, recycling in general showed lower emission of CO2 per kg material than primary production, so the recycling of materials (considered in this study) is thus beneficial in most cases.

U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.03.011

DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.03.011

M3 - Journal article

VL - 87

SP - 30

EP - 45

JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling

JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling

SN - 0921-3449

ER -