Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify the most efficient sampling method for quantitative PCR-based detection of airborne human norovirus (NoV).
Methods and Results:
A comparative experiment was conducted in an aerosol chamber using aerosolised murine norovirus (MNV) as a surrogate for NoV. Sampling was performed using a nylon (NY) filter in conjunction with four kinds of personal samplers; Gesamtstaubprobenahme sampler (GSP), Triplex-cyclone sampler (TC), 3-piece closed-faced Millipore cassette (3P) and a 2-stage NIOSH cyclone sampler (NIO). In addition, sampling was performed using the GSP sampler with four different filter types; NY, polycarbonate (PC), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and gelatine (GEL). The sampling efficiency of MNV was significantly influenced by both sampler and filter type. The GSP sampler was found to give significantly (P<0.05) higher recovery of aerosolised MNV than 3P and NIO. A higher recovery was also found for GSP compared with TC, albeit not significantly. Finally, recovery of aerosolised MNV was significantly (P<0.05) higher using NY than PC, PTFE and GEL filters.
Conclusions: The GSP sampler combined with a nylon filter was found to be the best method for personal filter-based sampling of airborne NoV.
Significance and Impact of the Study. The identification of a suitable NoV air sampler is an important step towards studying the association between exposure to airborne NoV and infection.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Applied Microbiology |
Volume | 124 |
Issue number | 4 |
Pages (from-to) | 990-1000 |
ISSN | 1364-5072 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- Air sampling
- Norovirus
- Bioaerosol
- Aerosolisation
- GSP sampler
- Filters
- Airborne exposure