Estimating the Robustness of Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments by Variation of Criteria Importance Order

Anders Vestergaard Jensen; Michael Bruhn Barfod; Steen Leleur

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9

Estimating the Robustness of Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments by Variation of Criteria Importance Order

Anders Vestergaard Jensen, Michael Bruhn Barfod, Steen Leleur

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Abstract This paper discusses the concept of using rank variation concerning the stakeholder prioritising of importance criteria for exploring the sensitivity of criteria weights in multi-criteria analysis (MCA). Thereby the robustness of the MCA-based decision support can be tested. The analysis described is based on the fact that when using MCA as a decision-support tool, questions often arise about the weighting (or prioritising) of the included criteria. This part of the MCA is seen as the most subjective part and could give reasons for discussion among the decision makers or stakeholders. Furthermore, the relative weights can make a large difference in the resulting assessment of alternatives (Hobbs and Meier 2000). Therefore it is highly relevant to introduce a procedure for estimating the importance of criteria weights. This paper proposes a methodology for estimating the robustness of weights used in additive utility models.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	New State of MCDM in the 21st Century : Selected Papers of the 20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making 2009
Editors	Yong Shi, Shouyang Wang, Jyrki Wallenius, Gang Kou
Publisher	Springer Publishing Company
Publication date	2011
Pages	59-67
Chapter	5
ISBN (Print)	978-3-642-19694-2
ISBN (Electronic)	978-3-642-19695-9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9
Publication status	Published - 2011
Event	20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making - Chengdu, China Duration: 21 Jun 2009 → 26 Jun 2009 Conference number: 20

Conference

Conference	20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making
Number	20
Country/Territory	China
City	Chengdu
Period	21/06/2009 → 26/06/2009

Series	Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems
ISSN	0075-8442

Keywords

Decision-support tool
Multi-criteria analysis
Rank order distribution
Stakeholder preference
COSIMA

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

Jensen, A. V., Barfod, M. B., & Leleur, S. (2011). Estimating the Robustness of Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments by Variation of Criteria Importance Order. In Y. Shi, S. Wang, J. Wallenius, & G. Kou (Eds.), New State of MCDM in the 21st Century: Selected Papers of the 20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making 2009 (pp. 59-67). Springer Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9

Jensen, Anders Vestergaard ; Barfod, Michael Bruhn ; Leleur, Steen. / Estimating the Robustness of Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments by Variation of Criteria Importance Order. New State of MCDM in the 21st Century: Selected Papers of the 20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making 2009. editor / Yong Shi ; Shouyang Wang ; Jyrki Wallenius ; Gang Kou. Springer Publishing Company, 2011. pp. 59-67 (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems).

@inproceedings{4079349101a8436a98c1d4ddf4115b0e,

title = "Estimating the Robustness of Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments by Variation of Criteria Importance Order",

abstract = "Abstract This paper discusses the concept of using rank variation concerning the stakeholder prioritising of importance criteria for exploring the sensitivity of criteria weights in multi-criteria analysis (MCA). Thereby the robustness of the MCA-based decision support can be tested. The analysis described is based on the fact that when using MCA as a decision-support tool, questions often arise about the weighting (or prioritising) of the included criteria. This part of the MCA is seen as the most subjective part and could give reasons for discussion among the decision makers or stakeholders. Furthermore, the relative weights can make a large difference in the resulting assessment of alternatives (Hobbs and Meier 2000). Therefore it is highly relevant to introduce a procedure for estimating the importance of criteria weights. This paper proposes a methodology for estimating the robustness of weights used in additive utility models.",

keywords = "Decision-support tool, Multi-criteria analysis, Rank order distribution, Stakeholder preference, COSIMA",

author = "Jensen, {Anders Vestergaard} and Barfod, {Michael Bruhn} and Steen Leleur",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-642-19694-2",

series = "Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems",

publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",

pages = "59--67",

editor = "Yong Shi and Shouyang Wang and Jyrki Wallenius and Gang Kou",

booktitle = "New State of MCDM in the 21st Century",

address = "United States",

note = "20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making ; Conference date: 21-06-2009 Through 26-06-2009",

}

Jensen, AV, Barfod, MB & Leleur, S 2011, Estimating the Robustness of Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments by Variation of Criteria Importance Order. in Y Shi, S Wang, J Wallenius & G Kou (eds), New State of MCDM in the 21st Century: Selected Papers of the 20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making 2009. Springer Publishing Company, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, pp. 59-67, 20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Chengdu, China, 21/06/2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9

Estimating the Robustness of Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments by Variation of Criteria Importance Order. / Jensen, Anders Vestergaard; Barfod, Michael Bruhn ; Leleur, Steen.
New State of MCDM in the 21st Century: Selected Papers of the 20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making 2009. ed. / Yong Shi; Shouyang Wang; Jyrki Wallenius; Gang Kou. Springer Publishing Company, 2011. p. 59-67 (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Estimating the Robustness of Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments by Variation of Criteria Importance Order

AU - Jensen, Anders Vestergaard

AU - Barfod, Michael Bruhn

AU - Leleur, Steen

N1 - Conference code: 20

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Abstract This paper discusses the concept of using rank variation concerning the stakeholder prioritising of importance criteria for exploring the sensitivity of criteria weights in multi-criteria analysis (MCA). Thereby the robustness of the MCA-based decision support can be tested. The analysis described is based on the fact that when using MCA as a decision-support tool, questions often arise about the weighting (or prioritising) of the included criteria. This part of the MCA is seen as the most subjective part and could give reasons for discussion among the decision makers or stakeholders. Furthermore, the relative weights can make a large difference in the resulting assessment of alternatives (Hobbs and Meier 2000). Therefore it is highly relevant to introduce a procedure for estimating the importance of criteria weights. This paper proposes a methodology for estimating the robustness of weights used in additive utility models.

AB - Abstract This paper discusses the concept of using rank variation concerning the stakeholder prioritising of importance criteria for exploring the sensitivity of criteria weights in multi-criteria analysis (MCA). Thereby the robustness of the MCA-based decision support can be tested. The analysis described is based on the fact that when using MCA as a decision-support tool, questions often arise about the weighting (or prioritising) of the included criteria. This part of the MCA is seen as the most subjective part and could give reasons for discussion among the decision makers or stakeholders. Furthermore, the relative weights can make a large difference in the resulting assessment of alternatives (Hobbs and Meier 2000). Therefore it is highly relevant to introduce a procedure for estimating the importance of criteria weights. This paper proposes a methodology for estimating the robustness of weights used in additive utility models.

KW - Decision-support tool

KW - Multi-criteria analysis

KW - Rank order distribution

KW - Stakeholder preference

KW - COSIMA

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 978-3-642-19694-2

T3 - Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems

SP - 59

EP - 67

BT - New State of MCDM in the 21st Century

A2 - Shi, Yong

A2 - Wang, Shouyang

A2 - Wallenius, Jyrki

A2 - Kou, Gang

PB - Springer Publishing Company

T2 - 20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making

Y2 - 21 June 2009 through 26 June 2009

ER -

Jensen AV, Barfod MB , Leleur S. Estimating the Robustness of Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments by Variation of Criteria Importance Order. In Shi Y, Wang S, Wallenius J, Kou G, editors, New State of MCDM in the 21st Century: Selected Papers of the 20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making 2009. Springer Publishing Company. 2011. p. 59-67. (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9

Estimating the Robustness of Composite CBA and MCDA Assessments by Variation of Criteria Importance Order

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

OpenUrl availability

Fingerprint

Cite this