Estimating recreational harvest using interview-based recall survey: Implication of recalling in weight or numbers

Claus Reedtz Sparrevohn

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

For many overfished marine stocks, recreational fishing continues even though recovery plans are implemented and commercial landings regulated. In such cases, unbiased and precise estimates of recreational harvest are important for successful management. Harvest estimation often relies on interviewed-based surveys where fishers are asked to recall harvest within a given timeframe. However, the importance of whether fishers are requested to provide figures in weight or number is unresolved. Therefore, a recall survey aiming at estimating recreational harvest was designed, such that respondents could report harvest using either weight or numbers. It was found that: (1) a preference for reporting in numbers dominated; (2) reported mean individual weight of fish caught, differed between units preferences; and (3) when an estimate of total harvest in weight are calculated, these difference could result in a substantial bias through the conversion from numbers to weight. Based upon these results it is recommended that recreational harvest should be requested in numbers and not weight
Original languageEnglish
JournalFisheries Management and Ecology
Volume20
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)52-57
ISSN0969-997X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating recreational harvest using interview-based recall survey: Implication of recalling in weight or numbers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this