Erratum: Application of shotgun metagenomics to smoked salmon experimentally spiked: Comparison between sequencing and microbiological data using different bioinformatic approaches (Italian Journal of Food Safety, (2019), 8, 4)

Alessandra De Cesare*, Chiara Oliveri, Alex Lucchi, Frederique Pasquali, Sünje Johanna Pamp, Hanne Mordhorst, Claudia Wylezich, Casper Sahl Poulsen, Gerardo Manfreda

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

86 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The authors would like to correct the authorship in this publication, for the below-mentioned reason. Four co-authors (Johanna Pamp Sünje, Hanne Mordhorst, Claudia Wylezich, Casper Poulsen) have not been listed in the original version of the paper, due to an underestimation of the time needed to publish the results of PT as a whole, for which the dataset selected as described in the manuscript has been sub-mitted. As a consequence, part of the mock community used in the PT has been described in the paper published in Italian Journal of Food Safety for the first time. Therefore, these authors involved in the design and preparation of the mock community, as well as spiking of the samples, should be added. Their contribution is detailed below:-Pamp Sünje Johanna, designed mock community, contribution to design of ring trial.-Mordhorst Hanne, preparation of the spiked samples, shipping ring trial samples.-Wylezich Claudia, conceptualization and addition of the virus in the mock community.-Poulsen Casper, preparation of the mock community.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8991
JournalItalian Journal of Food Safety
Volume9
Issue number1
ISSN2239-7132
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Application of shotgun metagenomics to smoked salmon experimentally spiked: Comparison between sequencing and microbiological data using different bioinformatic approaches (Italian Journal of Food Safety, (2019), 8, 4)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this