52 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Using selected bio‐based feedstocks as alternative to fossil resources for producing biochemicals and derived materials is increasingly considered an important goal of a viable bioeconomy worldwide. However, to ensure that using selected bio‐based feedstocks is aligned with the global sustainability agenda, impacts along the entire life cycle of biochemical production systems need to be evaluated. This will help to identify those processes and technologies, which should be targeted for optimizing overall environmental sustainability performance. To address this need, we quantify environmental impacts of biochemical production using distinct bio‐based feedstocks, and discuss the potential for reducing impact hotspots via process optimization. Lactic acid was used as example biochemical derived from corn, corn stover and Laminaria sp. as feedstocks of different technological maturity. We used environmental life cycle assessment, a standardized methodology, considering the full life cycle of the analyzed biochemical production systems and a broad range of environmental impact indicators. Across production systems, feedstock production and biorefinery processes dominate life cycle impact profiles, with choice in energy mix and biomass processing as main aspects influencing impact results. Results show that uncertainty increases with decreasing technological maturity. When using Laminaria sp. (least mature among selected feedstocks), impacts are mainly driven by energy utilities (up to 86%) due to biomass drying. This suggests to focus on optimizing or avoiding this process for significantly increasing environmental sustainability of Laminaria sp.‐based lactic acid production. Our results demonstrate that applying life cycle assessment is useful for identifying environmental impact hotspots at an earlier stage of technological development across biochemical production systems without the aim of identifying the most environmentally friendly bio‐feedstock. With that, our approach contributes to improving the environmental sustainability of future biochemicals production as part of moving toward a viable bioeconomy worldwide.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGCB Bioenergy
Volume12
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)19-38
Number of pages20
ISSN1757-1693
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Biochemicals
  • Corn
  • Corn stover
  • Environmental sustainablility
  • Hotspots
  • Lactic acid
  • Laminaria sp.
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Uncertainty

Cite this

@article{a0f298370a03472a83a8fd21e185f9bd,
title = "Environmental hotspots of lactic acid production systems",
abstract = "Using selected bio‐based feedstocks as alternative to fossil resources for producing biochemicals and derived materials is increasingly considered an important goal of a viable bioeconomy worldwide. However, to ensure that using selected bio‐based feedstocks is aligned with the global sustainability agenda, impacts along the entire life cycle of biochemical production systems need to be evaluated. This will help to identify those processes and technologies, which should be targeted for optimizing overall environmental sustainability performance. To address this need, we quantify environmental impacts of biochemical production using distinct bio‐based feedstocks, and discuss the potential for reducing impact hotspots via process optimization. Lactic acid was used as example biochemical derived from corn, corn stover and Laminaria sp. as feedstocks of different technological maturity. We used environmental life cycle assessment, a standardized methodology, considering the full life cycle of the analyzed biochemical production systems and a broad range of environmental impact indicators. Across production systems, feedstock production and biorefinery processes dominate life cycle impact profiles, with choice in energy mix and biomass processing as main aspects influencing impact results. Results show that uncertainty increases with decreasing technological maturity. When using Laminaria sp. (least mature among selected feedstocks), impacts are mainly driven by energy utilities (up to 86{\%}) due to biomass drying. This suggests to focus on optimizing or avoiding this process for significantly increasing environmental sustainability of Laminaria sp.‐based lactic acid production. Our results demonstrate that applying life cycle assessment is useful for identifying environmental impact hotspots at an earlier stage of technological development across biochemical production systems without the aim of identifying the most environmentally friendly bio‐feedstock. With that, our approach contributes to improving the environmental sustainability of future biochemicals production as part of moving toward a viable bioeconomy worldwide.",
keywords = "Biochemicals, Corn, Corn stover, Environmental sustainablility, Hotspots, Lactic acid, Laminaria sp., Life cycle assessment, Uncertainty",
author = "{\'O}lafur {\"O}gmundarson and Sumesh Sukumara and Alexis Laurent and Peter Fantke",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1111/gcbb.12652",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "19--38",
journal = "GCB Bioenergy",
issn = "1757-1693",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Environmental hotspots of lactic acid production systems. / Ögmundarson, Ólafur; Sukumara, Sumesh; Laurent, Alexis; Fantke, Peter.

In: GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2020, p. 19-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental hotspots of lactic acid production systems

AU - Ögmundarson, Ólafur

AU - Sukumara, Sumesh

AU - Laurent, Alexis

AU - Fantke, Peter

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Using selected bio‐based feedstocks as alternative to fossil resources for producing biochemicals and derived materials is increasingly considered an important goal of a viable bioeconomy worldwide. However, to ensure that using selected bio‐based feedstocks is aligned with the global sustainability agenda, impacts along the entire life cycle of biochemical production systems need to be evaluated. This will help to identify those processes and technologies, which should be targeted for optimizing overall environmental sustainability performance. To address this need, we quantify environmental impacts of biochemical production using distinct bio‐based feedstocks, and discuss the potential for reducing impact hotspots via process optimization. Lactic acid was used as example biochemical derived from corn, corn stover and Laminaria sp. as feedstocks of different technological maturity. We used environmental life cycle assessment, a standardized methodology, considering the full life cycle of the analyzed biochemical production systems and a broad range of environmental impact indicators. Across production systems, feedstock production and biorefinery processes dominate life cycle impact profiles, with choice in energy mix and biomass processing as main aspects influencing impact results. Results show that uncertainty increases with decreasing technological maturity. When using Laminaria sp. (least mature among selected feedstocks), impacts are mainly driven by energy utilities (up to 86%) due to biomass drying. This suggests to focus on optimizing or avoiding this process for significantly increasing environmental sustainability of Laminaria sp.‐based lactic acid production. Our results demonstrate that applying life cycle assessment is useful for identifying environmental impact hotspots at an earlier stage of technological development across biochemical production systems without the aim of identifying the most environmentally friendly bio‐feedstock. With that, our approach contributes to improving the environmental sustainability of future biochemicals production as part of moving toward a viable bioeconomy worldwide.

AB - Using selected bio‐based feedstocks as alternative to fossil resources for producing biochemicals and derived materials is increasingly considered an important goal of a viable bioeconomy worldwide. However, to ensure that using selected bio‐based feedstocks is aligned with the global sustainability agenda, impacts along the entire life cycle of biochemical production systems need to be evaluated. This will help to identify those processes and technologies, which should be targeted for optimizing overall environmental sustainability performance. To address this need, we quantify environmental impacts of biochemical production using distinct bio‐based feedstocks, and discuss the potential for reducing impact hotspots via process optimization. Lactic acid was used as example biochemical derived from corn, corn stover and Laminaria sp. as feedstocks of different technological maturity. We used environmental life cycle assessment, a standardized methodology, considering the full life cycle of the analyzed biochemical production systems and a broad range of environmental impact indicators. Across production systems, feedstock production and biorefinery processes dominate life cycle impact profiles, with choice in energy mix and biomass processing as main aspects influencing impact results. Results show that uncertainty increases with decreasing technological maturity. When using Laminaria sp. (least mature among selected feedstocks), impacts are mainly driven by energy utilities (up to 86%) due to biomass drying. This suggests to focus on optimizing or avoiding this process for significantly increasing environmental sustainability of Laminaria sp.‐based lactic acid production. Our results demonstrate that applying life cycle assessment is useful for identifying environmental impact hotspots at an earlier stage of technological development across biochemical production systems without the aim of identifying the most environmentally friendly bio‐feedstock. With that, our approach contributes to improving the environmental sustainability of future biochemicals production as part of moving toward a viable bioeconomy worldwide.

KW - Biochemicals

KW - Corn

KW - Corn stover

KW - Environmental sustainablility

KW - Hotspots

KW - Lactic acid

KW - Laminaria sp.

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Uncertainty

U2 - 10.1111/gcbb.12652

DO - 10.1111/gcbb.12652

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 19

EP - 38

JO - GCB Bioenergy

JF - GCB Bioenergy

SN - 1757-1693

IS - 1

ER -