Ensiling and hydrothermal pretreatment of grass: Consequences for enzymatic biomass conversion and total monosaccharide yields

Morten Ambye-Jensen, Katja Salomon Johansen, Thomas Didion, Zsófia Kádár, Anne S. Meyer

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

300 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ensiling may act as a pretreatment of fresh grass biomass and increase the enzymatic conversion of structural carbohydrates to fermentable sugars. However, ensiling does not provide sufficient severity to be a standalone pretreatment method. Here, ensiling of grass is combined with hydrothermal treatment (HTT) with the aim of improving the enzymatic biomass convertibility and decrease the required temperature of the HTT. Results: Grass silage (Festulolium Hykor) was hydrothermally treated at temperatures of 170, 180, and 190°C for 10 minutes. Relative to HTT treated dry grass, ensiling increased the solubilization of dry matter (DM) during HTT and gave increased glucan content, but lower lignin in the insoluble fiber fraction. Ensiling improved glucose yields in the enzymatic hydrolysis of the washed solid fiber fraction at the lower HTT temperatures. At 170°C glucose yield improved from 17 to 24 (w/w)% (45 to 57% cellulose convertibility), and at 180°C glucose yield improved from 22 to 29 (w/w)% (54 to 69% cellulose convertibility). Direct HTT of grass at 190°C gave the same high glucose yield as for grass silage (35 (w/w)% (77% cellulose convertibility)) and improved xylan yields (27% xylan convertibility). The effect of ensiling of grass prior to HTT improved the enzymatic conversion of cellulose for HTT at 170 and 180°C, but the increased glucose release did not make up for the loss of water soluble carbohydrates (WSC) during ensiling. Overall, sugar yields (C6 + C5) were similar for HTT of grass and grass silage at both 170 and 180°C, but at 190°C the overall sugar yield was better for HTT of dry grass. Conclusions: This study unequivocally establishes that ensiling of grass as a biomass pretreatment method comes with a loss of WSC. The loss of WSC by ensiling is not necessarily compensated for by providing a lower temperature requirement for HTT for high enzymatic monosaccharide release. However, ensiling can be an advantageous storage method prior to grass processing. © 2014 Ambye-Jensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBiotechnology for Biofuels
Volume7
Issue number1
Number of pages12
ISSN1754-6834
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Energy (all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Biotechnology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Combined pretreatment
  • Ensiling
  • Enzymatic hydrolysis
  • Grass
  • Hydrothermal treatment
  • Silage
  • Bioconversion
  • Biomass
  • Cellulose
  • Combined pre treatments
  • Hydrothermal treatments
  • Glucose
  • biomass
  • cellulose
  • dry matter
  • enzyme
  • glucose
  • grass
  • hydrolysis
  • lignin
  • monosaccharide
  • silage
  • solubilization
  • temperature effect
  • Festulolium

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ensiling and hydrothermal pretreatment of grass: Consequences for enzymatic biomass conversion and total monosaccharide yields'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this