Enhanced Metabolite Productivity of Escherichia coli Adapted to Glucose M9 Minimal Medium

Peter Rugbjerg, Adam M. Feist, Morten Otto Alexander Sommer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

253 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

High productivity of biotechnological strains is important to industrial fermentation processes and can be constrained by precursor availability and substrate uptake rate. Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) of Escherichia coli MG1655 to glucose minimal M9 medium has been shown to increase strain fitness, mainly through a key mutation in the transcriptional regulator rpoB, which increases flux through central carbon metabolism and the glucose uptake rate. We wanted to test the hypothesis that a substrate uptake enhancing rpoB mutation can translate to increased productivity in a strain possessing a heterologous metabolite pathway. When engineered for heterologous mevalonate production, we found that E. coli rpoB E672K strains displayed 114–167% higher glucose uptake rates and 48–77% higher mevalonate productivities in glucose minimal M9 medium. This improvement in heterologous mevalonate productivity of the rpoB E672K strain is likely mediated by the elevated glucose uptake rate of such strains, which favors overflow metabolism toward acetate production and availability of acetyl-CoA as precursor. These results demonstrate the utility of adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) to generate a platform strain for an increased production rate for a heterologous product.
Original languageEnglish
Article number166
JournalFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Volume6
Number of pages6
ISSN2296-4185
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Productivity
  • Glycolytic flux
  • Platform strain
  • Adaptive laboratory evolution
  • Mevalonic acid

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Enhanced Metabolite Productivity of <i>Escherichia coli</i> Adapted to Glucose M9 Minimal Medium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this