TY - GEN
T1 - Energy and exergy analysis of the Kalina cycle for use in concentrated solar power plants with direct steam generation
AU - Knudsen, Thomas
AU - Clausen, Lasse Røngaard
AU - Haglind, Fredrik
AU - Modi, Anish
N1 - © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - In concentrated solar power plants using direct steam generation, the usage of a thermal storage unit based only on
sensible heat may lead to large exergetic losses during charging and discharging, due to a poor matching of the
temperature profiles. By the use of the Kalina cycle, in which evaporation and condensation takes place over a
temperature range, the efficiency of the heat exchange processes can be improved, possibly resulting also in
improved overall performance of the system. This paper is aimed at evaluating the prospect of using the Kalina cycle
for concentrated solar power plants with direct steam generation. The following two scenarios were addressed using
energy and exergy analysis: generating power using heat from only the receiver and using only stored heat. For each
of these scenarios comparisons were made for mixture concentrations ranging from 0.1 mole fraction of ammonia to
0.9, and compared to the conventional Rankine cycle. This comparison was then also carried out for various turbine
inlet pressures (100 bar to critical pressures). The results suggest that there would be no benefit from using a Kalina
cycle instead of a Rankine cycle when generating power from heat taken directly from the solar receiver. Compared
to a baseline Rankine cycle, the efficiency of the Kalina cycle was about around 5% lower for this scenario. When
using heat from the storage unit, however, the Kalina cycle achieved efficiencies up to 20% higher than what was
achieved using the Rankine cycle. Overall, when based on an average assumed 18 hours cycle, consisting of 12 hours
using heat from the receiver and 6 hours using heat from the storage, the Kalina cycle and Rankine cycle achieved
almost equal efficiencies. A Kalina cycle operating with an ammonia mole fraction of about 0.7 returned an averaged
efficiency of about 30.7% compared to 30.3% for the Rankine cycle.
AB - In concentrated solar power plants using direct steam generation, the usage of a thermal storage unit based only on
sensible heat may lead to large exergetic losses during charging and discharging, due to a poor matching of the
temperature profiles. By the use of the Kalina cycle, in which evaporation and condensation takes place over a
temperature range, the efficiency of the heat exchange processes can be improved, possibly resulting also in
improved overall performance of the system. This paper is aimed at evaluating the prospect of using the Kalina cycle
for concentrated solar power plants with direct steam generation. The following two scenarios were addressed using
energy and exergy analysis: generating power using heat from only the receiver and using only stored heat. For each
of these scenarios comparisons were made for mixture concentrations ranging from 0.1 mole fraction of ammonia to
0.9, and compared to the conventional Rankine cycle. This comparison was then also carried out for various turbine
inlet pressures (100 bar to critical pressures). The results suggest that there would be no benefit from using a Kalina
cycle instead of a Rankine cycle when generating power from heat taken directly from the solar receiver. Compared
to a baseline Rankine cycle, the efficiency of the Kalina cycle was about around 5% lower for this scenario. When
using heat from the storage unit, however, the Kalina cycle achieved efficiencies up to 20% higher than what was
achieved using the Rankine cycle. Overall, when based on an average assumed 18 hours cycle, consisting of 12 hours
using heat from the receiver and 6 hours using heat from the storage, the Kalina cycle and Rankine cycle achieved
almost equal efficiencies. A Kalina cycle operating with an ammonia mole fraction of about 0.7 returned an averaged
efficiency of about 30.7% compared to 30.3% for the Rankine cycle.
KW - Kalina cycle
KW - Concentrated solar power
KW - Direct steam generation
KW - Thermal energy storage
U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.041
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.041
M3 - Article in proceedings
VL - 57
T3 - Energy Procedia
SP - 361
EP - 370
BT - Energy Procedia
PB - Elsevier
T2 - ISES Solar World Congress 2013
Y2 - 3 November 2013 through 7 November 2013
ER -