Effects of diotic fringes on interaural disparity detection (L)

Nicolas Le Goff, Armin Kohlrausch, Torsten Dau

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


Detection thresholds were measured for interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs) that were carried by probe segments embedded in otherwise diotic broadband noise (fringe). The duration of the probe was varied between 5 and 200 ms, and the duration of the fringe was between 5 and 100 ms. Consistent with results of Akeroyd and Bernstein [(2001). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2516-2526], it was found that a 5-ms fringe placed before a 5-ms probe (forward fringe) led to a larger threshold elevation than a 5-ms fringe placed after the probe (backward fringe). As suggested by Akeroyd and Bernstein, this effect was accounted for by a model providing an onset emphasis of a factor of 2. In contrast, for longer probe and fringe durations, which have not been tested before, a backward fringe had a stronger effect than a forward fringe. This surprising effect was accounted for by an extended model that provided an offset emphasis of a factor of 11 for a 50-ms probe and a 100-ms fringe.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAcoustical Society of America. Journal
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)2959-2962
Publication statusPublished - 2012


  • Acoustic noise
  • Acoustic signal detection
  • Acoustic signal processing


Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of diotic fringes on interaural disparity detection (L)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this