Abstract
It has been argued that a major shortcoming in the International
Maritime Organization (IMO) Interim Guidelines for Approval of
Alternative Methods of Design and Construction of Oil Tankers in
Collision and Grounding is that grounding and collision damages
normalized by the main dimensions of the ship have the same
probability density distributions regardless of a particular
structural design and ship size.The present paper explores
analytical methods for assessing the overall effect of structural
design on the damage distributions in accidental grounding and
collisions. The results are expressed in simple expressions
involving structural dimensions and the building material of the
ships. The study shows that the density distribution for collision
and grounding damages normalized by the main dimensions of the
ship depends on the size of the ship. A larger ship has a higher
probability of a larger relative damage length than that of a
smaller ship in grounding damage. On the other hand, the damages
to the side structure caused by ship collisions are found to be
relatively smaller for large ships.The main conclusion is that the
existing IMO damage distributions will severely underestimate the
grounding damages to the bottom structure of larger vessels and to
a lesser extent overestimate collision damages to the side
structure of the hull.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Ocean Engineering |
| Volume | 27 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1161-1179 |
| ISSN | 0029-8018 |
| Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver