Dynamic accounting of greenhouse gas emissions from cascading utilisation of wood waste

Giorgia Faraca*, Davide Tonini, Thomas Fruergaard Astrup

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Cascading utilisation of post-consumer wood waste has recently gained increasing attention in the European Union, aiming for a society in which the resource's properties are optimized through sequential uses. To date, material utilisation of wood waste has been limited to particleboard production, with additional niche alternatives being restricted by quality requirements for wood waste. In this consequential life cycle assessment focusing on post-consumer wood collected at Danish recycling centres, Global Warming Potential (GWP) impacts from quality-driven choices for cascading management of wood waste were compared with those from handling mixed wood waste qualities. GWPs were modelled by considering the dynamic profile of greenhouse gas emissions (including biogenic carbon dioxide) for two time horizons (100 and 500 years). The robustness of the results was tested by varying modelling assumptions with respect to electricity system, wood sourcing and associated rotation period, and impacts from indirect land use changes. The results demonstrated that valuing quality over quantity in wood waste management can ensure larger GWP savings, especially if recycling applications have a long lifetime and/or substitute energy-intensive products; such results were confirmed under all scenario analyses. Inclusion of land use changes credited land-intensive products. More cascade steps of the wood waste resource ensured larger savings; however, assumptions on the electricity mix, on the source of the wood alongside the choice of the time horizon for GWP greatly influenced the results on cascading management.
Original languageEnglish
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume651
Issue numberPart 2
Pages (from-to)2689-2700
ISSN0048-9697
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Circular Economy
  • Time-dependency
  • Global Warming Potential (GWP)
  • Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA)
  • Quality
  • Resource cascading

Cite this

@article{e775dce7556f4f6790f8296b0698cea2,
title = "Dynamic accounting of greenhouse gas emissions from cascading utilisation of wood waste",
abstract = "Cascading utilisation of post-consumer wood waste has recently gained increasing attention in the European Union, aiming for a society in which the resource's properties are optimized through sequential uses. To date, material utilisation of wood waste has been limited to particleboard production, with additional niche alternatives being restricted by quality requirements for wood waste. In this consequential life cycle assessment focusing on post-consumer wood collected at Danish recycling centres, Global Warming Potential (GWP) impacts from quality-driven choices for cascading management of wood waste were compared with those from handling mixed wood waste qualities. GWPs were modelled by considering the dynamic profile of greenhouse gas emissions (including biogenic carbon dioxide) for two time horizons (100 and 500 years). The robustness of the results was tested by varying modelling assumptions with respect to electricity system, wood sourcing and associated rotation period, and impacts from indirect land use changes. The results demonstrated that valuing quality over quantity in wood waste management can ensure larger GWP savings, especially if recycling applications have a long lifetime and/or substitute energy-intensive products; such results were confirmed under all scenario analyses. Inclusion of land use changes credited land-intensive products. More cascade steps of the wood waste resource ensured larger savings; however, assumptions on the electricity mix, on the source of the wood alongside the choice of the time horizon for GWP greatly influenced the results on cascading management.",
keywords = "Circular Economy, Time-dependency, Global Warming Potential (GWP), Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA), Quality, Resource cascading",
author = "Giorgia Faraca and Davide Tonini and Astrup, {Thomas Fruergaard}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.136",
language = "English",
volume = "651",
pages = "2689--2700",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "Part 2",

}

Dynamic accounting of greenhouse gas emissions from cascading utilisation of wood waste. / Faraca, Giorgia; Tonini, Davide; Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 651, No. Part 2, 2019, p. 2689-2700.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamic accounting of greenhouse gas emissions from cascading utilisation of wood waste

AU - Faraca, Giorgia

AU - Tonini, Davide

AU - Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Cascading utilisation of post-consumer wood waste has recently gained increasing attention in the European Union, aiming for a society in which the resource's properties are optimized through sequential uses. To date, material utilisation of wood waste has been limited to particleboard production, with additional niche alternatives being restricted by quality requirements for wood waste. In this consequential life cycle assessment focusing on post-consumer wood collected at Danish recycling centres, Global Warming Potential (GWP) impacts from quality-driven choices for cascading management of wood waste were compared with those from handling mixed wood waste qualities. GWPs were modelled by considering the dynamic profile of greenhouse gas emissions (including biogenic carbon dioxide) for two time horizons (100 and 500 years). The robustness of the results was tested by varying modelling assumptions with respect to electricity system, wood sourcing and associated rotation period, and impacts from indirect land use changes. The results demonstrated that valuing quality over quantity in wood waste management can ensure larger GWP savings, especially if recycling applications have a long lifetime and/or substitute energy-intensive products; such results were confirmed under all scenario analyses. Inclusion of land use changes credited land-intensive products. More cascade steps of the wood waste resource ensured larger savings; however, assumptions on the electricity mix, on the source of the wood alongside the choice of the time horizon for GWP greatly influenced the results on cascading management.

AB - Cascading utilisation of post-consumer wood waste has recently gained increasing attention in the European Union, aiming for a society in which the resource's properties are optimized through sequential uses. To date, material utilisation of wood waste has been limited to particleboard production, with additional niche alternatives being restricted by quality requirements for wood waste. In this consequential life cycle assessment focusing on post-consumer wood collected at Danish recycling centres, Global Warming Potential (GWP) impacts from quality-driven choices for cascading management of wood waste were compared with those from handling mixed wood waste qualities. GWPs were modelled by considering the dynamic profile of greenhouse gas emissions (including biogenic carbon dioxide) for two time horizons (100 and 500 years). The robustness of the results was tested by varying modelling assumptions with respect to electricity system, wood sourcing and associated rotation period, and impacts from indirect land use changes. The results demonstrated that valuing quality over quantity in wood waste management can ensure larger GWP savings, especially if recycling applications have a long lifetime and/or substitute energy-intensive products; such results were confirmed under all scenario analyses. Inclusion of land use changes credited land-intensive products. More cascade steps of the wood waste resource ensured larger savings; however, assumptions on the electricity mix, on the source of the wood alongside the choice of the time horizon for GWP greatly influenced the results on cascading management.

KW - Circular Economy

KW - Time-dependency

KW - Global Warming Potential (GWP)

KW - Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA)

KW - Quality

KW - Resource cascading

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.136

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.136

M3 - Journal article

VL - 651

SP - 2689

EP - 2700

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

IS - Part 2

ER -