Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dose-response relationships in transcranial brain stimulation: Physics, physiology and mechanism

  • Ghazaleh Soleimani
  • , Ivan Alekseichuk
  • , Christian Aurup
  • , Til Ole Bergmann
  • , Sven Bestmann
  • , Lysianne Beynel
  • , Carys Evans
  • , Flavio Frohlich
  • , Peyman Ghobadi-Azbari
  • , Colleen A. Hanlon
  • , Florian Kasten
  • , Elisa E. Konofagou
  • , Maximilian Lueckel
  • , Javier Márquez-Ruiz
  • , Lucia Mencarelli
  • , Mohsen Mosayebi-Samani
  • , Cecilia Neige
  • , Alexander Opitz
  • , Angel V. Peterchev
  • , Oula Puonti
  • Harold A. Sackeim, Guillermo Sánchez-Garrido Campos, Hartwig R. Siebner, Axel Thielscher, Andreas Vlachos, Mihaly Voroslakos, Michael A. Nitsche, Sarah H. Lisanby, Marom Bikson, Hamed Ekhtiari*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Northwestern University
  • Columbia University
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • University College London
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Wake Forest University
  • Trier University
  • Universidad Pablo de Olavide
  • IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia - Roma
  • Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
  • Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1
  • Duke University
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • University of Freiburg
  • New York University
  • Arizona State University
  • City University of New York
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

21 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

The use of noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation methods, such as transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), has grown significantly over the past two decades. Evidence indicates that the dose-response relationship in brain stimulation is neither straightforward nor monotonic, with outcomes influenced by factors such as the brain state, anatomical variability, and neurophysiological mechanisms. Despite advancements in the field, there is still no consensus on standards for estimating and reporting delivered and received stimulation doses or defining dose-response relationships. This paper addresses these gaps by discussing four key areas: (1) factors influencing the delivered dose (stimulation parameters applied at the scalp), (2) quantification of the received dose (electric or acoustic fields delivered to brain tissue), (3) characterization of physiological, behavioral, and molecular responses to specific delivered/received doses, and (4) the dose-response relationship, which describes how variations in dose modulate brain function and behavior. Drawing on evidence from human and animal studies conducted in silico, in vitro, and in vivo, we outline challenges, propose solutions, and summarize current consensus standards. By promoting rigorous methodologies and transparent reporting, this paper aims to advance the reproducibility, safety, and efficacy of research on dose-response assessment in transcranial brain stimulation and its clinical applications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103067
JournalBrain Stimulation
Volume19
Issue number3
Number of pages14
ISSN1935-861X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Keywords

  • Dose
  • Dose-response
  • ECT
  • Neuromodulation
  • tDCS
  • tES
  • tFUS
  • TMS
  • Transcranial brain stimulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dose-response relationships in transcranial brain stimulation: Physics, physiology and mechanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this