Discomfort Glare Cut-off Values from Field and Laboratory Studies

C. Pierson, M. Sarey Khanie, M. Bodart, J. Wienold

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    For the application of discomfort glare metrics, a categorisation is used, dividing the metric scale into categories of perception. These categories are separated by borderline values, or so-called cut-off values. Recent literature shows that these cut-off values are lower when they are derived from field study data than those derived from laboratory study data. To investigate this further, the data from one field study and two laboratory studies was used to derive and compare cut-off values corresponding to three borderlines. The results show that the field study cut-off values were systematically lower than the laboratory study ones, implying that discomfort glare is reported at lower stimulus magnitudes in the field. Although further research is required on that topic, several hypotheses are discussed in order to explain the gap between cut-off values derived from field data and cut-off values derived from laboratory data.
    Recommendations for future studies are also provided.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 29th CIE SESSION
    Number of pages10
    PublisherCIE Commision Internationale de L'eclairage
    Publication date2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019
    EventInternational Commission on Illumination Session - Washington DC, United States
    Duration: 18 Jun 201922 Jun 2019
    http://washington2019.cie.co.at/

    Seminar

    SeminarInternational Commission on Illumination Session
    Country/TerritoryUnited States
    CityWashington DC
    Period18/06/201922/06/2019
    Internet address

    Keywords

    • Daylight
    • Discomfort glare
    • Cut-off value
    • Laboratory study
    • Field study

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Discomfort Glare Cut-off Values from Field and Laboratory Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this