Abstract
An excellent way for a protocol to obtain shared keys is Diffie-Hellman. For the automated verification of security protocols, the use of Diffie-Hellman poses a certain amount of difficulty, because it requires algebraic reasoning. Several tools work in the free algebra and even for tools that do support Diffie-Hellman, the algebraic reasoning becomes a bottleneck. We provide a new relative-soundness result: for a large class of protocols, significantly restricting the abilities of the intruder is without loss of attacks. We also show the soundness of a very restrictive encoding of Diffie-Hellman proposed by Millen and how to obtain a problem that can be answered in the free algebra without increasing its size upon encoding. This enables the efficient use of free-algebra verification tools for Diffie-Hellman based protocols and significantly reduces search-spaces for tools that do support algebraic reasoning.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Formal Aspects of Security and Trust : 8th International Workshop, FAST 2011 |
| Editors | Gilles Barthe, Anupam Datta, Sandro Etalle |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Publication date | 2011 |
| Pages | 214-229 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Event | Formal Aspects of Security and Trust: 8th International Workshop - Leuven, Belgium Duration: 12 Sept 2011 → 14 Sept 2011 Conference number: 8 |
Conference
| Conference | Formal Aspects of Security and Trust |
|---|---|
| Number | 8 |
| Country/Territory | Belgium |
| City | Leuven |
| Period | 12/09/2011 → 14/09/2011 |
| Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
|---|---|
| ISSN | 0302-9743 |