Abstract
An excellent way for a protocol to obtain shared keys is Diffie-Hellman. For the automated verification of security protocols, the use of Diffie-Hellman poses a certain amount of difficulty, because it requires algebraic reasoning. Several tools work in the free algebra and even for tools that do support Diffie-Hellman, the algebraic reasoning becomes a bottleneck. We provide a new relative-soundness result: for a large class of protocols, significantly restricting the abilities of the intruder is without loss of attacks. We also show the soundness of a very restrictive encoding of Diffie-Hellman proposed by Millen and how to obtain a problem that can be answered in the free algebra without increasing its size upon encoding. This enables the efficient use of free-algebra verification tools for Diffie-Hellman based protocols and significantly reduces search-spaces for tools that do support algebraic reasoning.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Formal Aspects of Security and Trust : 8th International Workshop, FAST 2011 |
Editors | Gilles Barthe, Anupam Datta, Sandro Etalle |
Publisher | Springer |
Publication date | 2011 |
Pages | 214-229 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Event | Formal Aspects of Security and Trust: 8th International Workshop - Leuven, Belgium Duration: 12 Sept 2011 → 14 Sept 2011 Conference number: 8 |
Conference
Conference | Formal Aspects of Security and Trust |
---|---|
Number | 8 |
Country/Territory | Belgium |
City | Leuven |
Period | 12/09/2011 → 14/09/2011 |
Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
---|---|
ISSN | 0302-9743 |