Abstract
Two verified wind atlases have been developed for South Africa. The first adopted a statistical-dynamical approach and the
second a novel, fully dynamical approach. We verify the atlases against an observational wind atlas generated from three years of
data from 10 measurement masts. The statistical-dynamical method underestimates the generalized mean wind speeds at the
observation sites whereas the fully dynamical method has lower biases and slightly overestimates the generalized mean wind
speeds. The dynamical method captures thermally forced dynamical processes and also resolves topographically enhanced flows
the statistical-dynamical method cannot.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Energy Procedia |
Volume | 76 |
Pages (from-to) | 128-137 |
ISSN | 1876-6102 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Event | European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2015 - Austria Center Vienna , Vienna, Austria Duration: 12 Apr 2015 → 17 Apr 2015 http://www.egu2015.eu/egu_today.html |
Conference
Conference | European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2015 |
---|---|
Location | Austria Center Vienna |
Country/Territory | Austria |
City | Vienna |
Period | 12/04/2015 → 17/04/2015 |
Internet address |
Bibliographical note
© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND licenseKeywords
- Numerical wind atlas
- South Africa
- KAMM
- ERF
- WAsP
- Wind atlas methodology