TY - JOUR
T1 - Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems
T2 - An Interlaboratory Comparison Study
AU - Geiss, Otmar
AU - Bianchi, Ivana
AU - Bucher, Guillaume
AU - Verleysen, Eveline
AU - Brassinne, Frédéric
AU - Mast, Jan
AU - Loeschner, Katrin
AU - Givelet, Lucas
AU - Cubadda, Francesco
AU - Ferraris, Francesca
AU - Raggi, Andrea
AU - Iacoponi, Francesca
AU - Peters, Ruud
AU - Undas, Anna
AU - Müller, Alexandra
AU - Meinhardt, Ann-Katrin
AU - Hetzer, Birgit
AU - Gräf, Volker
AU - Bustos, Antonio R. Montoro
AU - Barrero-Moreno, Josefa
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - In single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (spICP-MS), the transport efficiency is fundamental for the correct determination of both particle number concentration and size. In the present study, transport efficiency was systematically determined on three different days with six carefully characterised gold nanoparticle (AuNP) suspensions and in seven European and US expert laboratories using different ICP-MS instruments and spICP-MS software. Both particle size-(TES)-and particle frequency-(TEF)-methods were applied. The resulting transport efficiencies did not deviate much under ideal conditions. The TEF method however systematically resulted in lower transport efficiencies. The extent of this difference (0-300% rel. difference) depended largely on the choice and storage conditions of the nanoparticle suspensions used for the determination. The TES method is recommended when the principal measurement objective is particle size. If the main aim of the measurement is the determination of the particle number concentration, the TEF approach could be preferred as it might better account for particle losses in the sample introduction system.
AB - In single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (spICP-MS), the transport efficiency is fundamental for the correct determination of both particle number concentration and size. In the present study, transport efficiency was systematically determined on three different days with six carefully characterised gold nanoparticle (AuNP) suspensions and in seven European and US expert laboratories using different ICP-MS instruments and spICP-MS software. Both particle size-(TES)-and particle frequency-(TEF)-methods were applied. The resulting transport efficiencies did not deviate much under ideal conditions. The TEF method however systematically resulted in lower transport efficiencies. The extent of this difference (0-300% rel. difference) depended largely on the choice and storage conditions of the nanoparticle suspensions used for the determination. The TES method is recommended when the principal measurement objective is particle size. If the main aim of the measurement is the determination of the particle number concentration, the TEF approach could be preferred as it might better account for particle losses in the sample introduction system.
KW - Single particle ICP-MS
KW - Transport efficiency
KW - Gold nanoparticles
U2 - 10.3390/nano12040725
DO - 10.3390/nano12040725
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35215053
SN - 2079-4991
VL - 12
JO - Nanomaterials
JF - Nanomaterials
IS - 4
M1 - 725
ER -