Determination of iron by Z-GFAAS and the influence of short-term precision and long-term precision

Jens Andersen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

474 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A detailed method validation of graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) with Zeeman background correction was performed. The aim is to perform a detailed investigation of short-term precision as opposed to long-term precision. It was suggested that release of graphite flakes into the light path during measurement significantly influenced the performance of the method. It was found that significant deviations with respect to the certified values were frequent and an estimate of reliable uncertainties was obtained only after a high number of repetitions. Uncertainty of intralaboratory testing was evaluated as a method to estimate uncertainties that are comparable to uncertainties that were obtained by intralaboratory testing and to uncertainties predicted by the Horwitz curve. To a large extent, the uncertainty in measurement that was predicted by pooled calibrations corresponded to the uncertainties that were obtained from multiple determinations of unknowns. It was thus proposed that a large proportion of the difference in uncertainty in measurement between laboratories could be explained by properties of the different detectors. In order to support accuracy, it is suggested that a higher level of uncertainty should be accepted in analytical investigations.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCentral European Journal of Chemistry
Volume12
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)194-205
ISSN1895-1066
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Quality assurance
  • Iron analysis
  • Z-GFAAS
  • Z-ETAAS
  • Method validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determination of iron by Z-GFAAS and the influence of short-term precision and long-term precision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this