Detailed comparison of two approximate methods for the solution of the scalar wave equation for a rectangular optical waveguide

Thomas Rasmussen, Jørn Hedegaard Povlsen, Anders Overgaard Bjarklev, Ole Lumholt, Bo Pedersen, Karsten Rottwitt

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    500 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Two approximate methods for the determination of the fundamental mode of an optical waveguide with rectangular core cross section and step refractive-index profiles are presented and analyzed thoroughly. Both methods are based on Galerkin's method. The first method uses Hermite-Gauss basis functions and the second uses the guided and nonguided slab waveguide solutions as basis functions. The results are compared with results from an accurate circular harmonic analysis. Both methods provide values of the normalized propagation constant with errors less than 0.1% for practical rectangular single-mode waveguides. The slab waveguide method is the fastest, and even when only one slab waveguide mode is used the propagation constant for the fundamental mode can be calculated with an error of less than 1%. The slab waveguide method also gives very accurate results for the propagation constant for higher order modes.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Lightwave Technology
    Volume11
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)429-433
    ISSN0733-8724
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1993

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright: 1993 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Detailed comparison of two approximate methods for the solution of the scalar wave equation for a rectangular optical waveguide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this