Design Ontology-Contrasting an empirical and a theoritical approach

Saeema Ahmed; Mario Storga

Design Ontology-Contrasting an empirical and a theoritical approach

Saeema Ahmed, Mario Storga

University of Zagreb

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Abstract

This paper presents the result of the research that compares two previous and separate efforts of the authors to develop engineering design ontologies with a longer-term aim to produce a useable and theoretical sound ontology. The research methodology adopted was to examine each of the concepts and relations contained within each of the ontologies, Design Ontology, EDIT, with respect to the other. The comparison process resulted in examination and evaluation of both ontologies, with a few minor changes resulting from this. Also the importance and need for two different views, one which is theoretical sound, while another that is applicable is recognised and argued.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	16th International conference on Engineering Design
Place of Publication	Paris
Publisher	Design Society
Publication date	2007
ISBN (Print)	1-904670-02-4
Publication status	Published - 2007
Event	16th International Conference on Engineering Design - Paris, France Duration: 28 Aug 2007 → 31 Aug 2007 Conference number: 16

Conference

Conference	16th International Conference on Engineering Design
Number	16
Country/Territory	France
City	Paris
Period	28/08/2007 → 31/08/2007

Keywords

Ontology
Engineering design

Access to Document

http://www.web.mek.dtu.dk/staff/sah/

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@inproceedings{bc9cc127287246ca927e104fdd032f84,

title = "Design Ontology-Contrasting an empirical and a theoritical approach",

abstract = "This paper presents the result of the research that compares two previous and separate efforts of the authors to develop engineering design ontologies with a longer-term aim to produce a useable and theoretical sound ontology. The research methodology adopted was to examine each of the concepts and relations contained within each of the ontologies, Design Ontology, EDIT, with respect to the other. The comparison process resulted in examination and evaluation of both ontologies, with a few minor changes resulting from this. Also the importance and need for two different views, one which is theoretical sound, while another that is applicable is recognised and argued.",

keywords = "Ontology, Engineering design",

author = "Saeema Ahmed and Mario Storga",

year = "2007",

language = "English",

isbn = "1-904670-02-4",

booktitle = "16th International conference on Engineering Design",

publisher = "Design Society",

note = "16th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED07 ; Conference date: 28-08-2007 Through 31-08-2007",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Design Ontology-Contrasting an empirical and a theoritical approach

AU - Ahmed, Saeema

AU - Storga, Mario

N1 - Conference code: 16

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper presents the result of the research that compares two previous and separate efforts of the authors to develop engineering design ontologies with a longer-term aim to produce a useable and theoretical sound ontology. The research methodology adopted was to examine each of the concepts and relations contained within each of the ontologies, Design Ontology, EDIT, with respect to the other. The comparison process resulted in examination and evaluation of both ontologies, with a few minor changes resulting from this. Also the importance and need for two different views, one which is theoretical sound, while another that is applicable is recognised and argued.

AB - This paper presents the result of the research that compares two previous and separate efforts of the authors to develop engineering design ontologies with a longer-term aim to produce a useable and theoretical sound ontology. The research methodology adopted was to examine each of the concepts and relations contained within each of the ontologies, Design Ontology, EDIT, with respect to the other. The comparison process resulted in examination and evaluation of both ontologies, with a few minor changes resulting from this. Also the importance and need for two different views, one which is theoretical sound, while another that is applicable is recognised and argued.

KW - Ontology

KW - Engineering design

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 1-904670-02-4

BT - 16th International conference on Engineering Design

PB - Design Society

CY - Paris

T2 - 16th International Conference on Engineering Design

Y2 - 28 August 2007 through 31 August 2007

ER -

Design Ontology-Contrasting an empirical and a theoritical approach

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

OpenUrl availability

Fingerprint

Cite this