Depth-Bounded Epistemic Planning

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We propose a novel algorithm for epistemic planning based on dynamic epistemic logic (DEL). The novelty is that we limit the depth of reasoning of the planning agent to an upper bound b, meaning that the planning agent can only reason about higher-order knowledge to at most (modal) depth b. We then compute a plan requiring the lowest reasoning depth by iteratively incrementing the value of b. The algorithm relies at its core on a new type of “canonical” b-bisimulation contraction that guarantees unique minimal models by construction. This yields smaller states wrt. standard bisimulation contractions, and enables to efficiently check for visited states. We show soundness and completeness of our planning algorithm, under suitable bounds on reasoning depth, and that, for a bound b, it runs in (b+1)-EXPTIME. We implement the algorithm in a novel epistemic planner, AEDALUS, and compare it to the EFP 2.0 planner on several benchmarks from the literature, showing effective performance improvements.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
PublisherInternational Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization
Publication date2025
Pages729-739
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-956792-08-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Event22nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning - Melbourne, Australia
Duration: 11 Nov 202517 Nov 2025

Conference

Conference22nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
Country/TerritoryAustralia
CityMelbourne
Period11/11/202517/11/2025

Keywords

  • Epistemic Planning
  • Dynamic Epistemic Logic
  • Bounded Bisimulation Contractions
  • Bounded Reasoning Depth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Depth-Bounded Epistemic Planning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this