D5.4 Guidelines for interaction between seabed and support structure

Andrew Brennan, B. Mutlu Sumer, Erik Damgaard Christensen, Özgür Kirca, Andrzej Sawicki, Waldemar Swidzinski, Erik Damgaard Christensen

Research output: Book/ReportReport

747 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Geotechnical aspects of MUPs have been researched as part of the MERMAID project, with particular focus on the stability of foundation soils and their necessary scour protection. Deails of this work are published in a number of publications as provided in the reference list. Practitioners will be particularly drawn to the book “Liquefaction around Marine Structures” which covers many of the aforementioned subjects researched within MERMAID regarding liquefaction issues of platform designs (Sumer, 2014). The principal guidelines emerging from the complete body of work are:
Sandy soils have a high liquefaction potential, the effect of which must be accounted for in foundation design.
The presence of small quantities of fines within a sandy soil can act to increase the potential for wave-induced liquefaction. For the soils studied, this occurred for fine fractions up to 30% of total mass. Sandy soils with larger quantities of fines, or sandy clays, were less susceptible as the clay behaviour dominates above this fraction.
Liquefaction risk under gravity base foundations should be screened properly in the light of in-situ and lab tests of the seabed soil. The preliminary screening methods in the literature (some of which cited here) can be used as a first assessment. If these assessments indicate any risks, detailed analyses and models should be applied for liquefaction assessment.
When it comes to wave-induced liquefaction, standing waves would be seen in the vicinity of reflecting boundaries of platform foundations. Liquefaction under Standing waves, although qualitatively similar, show features different from that caused by progressive waves. The pore pressure accumulation and liquefaction starts at the nodal section, and progresses towards anti-nodal section due to a diffusion mechanism. The rate of liquefaction at the nodal section seems to be the same with the progressive wave case. Thus, mathematical models for progressive waves would also work for standing waves as far as the nodal section is concerned.
Rock berms (protection cover) on pipelines and power transmission cables are essential to protect the structure from floating to the seabed surface due to liquefaction, and strongly suggested to be constructed. However, once the rock berm is constructed, care must be exercised on backfilling the excavated soil into the trench intentionally or due to sediment transport.
Studies showed that a cover of stones constructed around the platform foundations for scour protection purpose would also serve for increasing the liquefaction resistance of surrounding soil.
However, the stability of such stones against sinkage must also be assured, and studies are ongoing to provide guidelines for this too, which should be ready before the completion of the project (before M48).
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages27
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

Brennan, A., Sumer, B. M., Christensen, E. D., Kirca, Ö., Sawicki, A., Swidzinski, W., & Christensen, E. D. (2015). D5.4 Guidelines for interaction between seabed and support structure.
Brennan, Andrew ; Sumer, B. Mutlu ; Christensen, Erik Damgaard ; Kirca, Özgür ; Sawicki, Andrzej ; Swidzinski, Waldemar ; Christensen, Erik Damgaard. / D5.4 Guidelines for interaction between seabed and support structure. 2015. 27 p.
@book{deb9c83be7224f489a6777c782ea2e0b,
title = "D5.4 Guidelines for interaction between seabed and support structure",
abstract = "Geotechnical aspects of MUPs have been researched as part of the MERMAID project, with particular focus on the stability of foundation soils and their necessary scour protection. Deails of this work are published in a number of publications as provided in the reference list. Practitioners will be particularly drawn to the book “Liquefaction around Marine Structures” which covers many of the aforementioned subjects researched within MERMAID regarding liquefaction issues of platform designs (Sumer, 2014). The principal guidelines emerging from the complete body of work are: Sandy soils have a high liquefaction potential, the effect of which must be accounted for in foundation design.The presence of small quantities of fines within a sandy soil can act to increase the potential for wave-induced liquefaction. For the soils studied, this occurred for fine fractions up to 30{\%} of total mass. Sandy soils with larger quantities of fines, or sandy clays, were less susceptible as the clay behaviour dominates above this fraction.Liquefaction risk under gravity base foundations should be screened properly in the light of in-situ and lab tests of the seabed soil. The preliminary screening methods in the literature (some of which cited here) can be used as a first assessment. If these assessments indicate any risks, detailed analyses and models should be applied for liquefaction assessment.When it comes to wave-induced liquefaction, standing waves would be seen in the vicinity of reflecting boundaries of platform foundations. Liquefaction under Standing waves, although qualitatively similar, show features different from that caused by progressive waves. The pore pressure accumulation and liquefaction starts at the nodal section, and progresses towards anti-nodal section due to a diffusion mechanism. The rate of liquefaction at the nodal section seems to be the same with the progressive wave case. Thus, mathematical models for progressive waves would also work for standing waves as far as the nodal section is concerned.Rock berms (protection cover) on pipelines and power transmission cables are essential to protect the structure from floating to the seabed surface due to liquefaction, and strongly suggested to be constructed. However, once the rock berm is constructed, care must be exercised on backfilling the excavated soil into the trench intentionally or due to sediment transport. Studies showed that a cover of stones constructed around the platform foundations for scour protection purpose would also serve for increasing the liquefaction resistance of surrounding soil. However, the stability of such stones against sinkage must also be assured, and studies are ongoing to provide guidelines for this too, which should be ready before the completion of the project (before M48).",
author = "Andrew Brennan and Sumer, {B. Mutlu} and Christensen, {Erik Damgaard} and {\"O}zg{\"u}r Kirca and Andrzej Sawicki and Waldemar Swidzinski and Christensen, {Erik Damgaard}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",

}

D5.4 Guidelines for interaction between seabed and support structure. / Brennan, Andrew; Sumer, B. Mutlu; Christensen, Erik Damgaard; Kirca, Özgür; Sawicki, Andrzej; Swidzinski, Waldemar; Christensen, Erik Damgaard.

2015. 27 p.

Research output: Book/ReportReport

TY - RPRT

T1 - D5.4 Guidelines for interaction between seabed and support structure

AU - Brennan, Andrew

AU - Sumer, B. Mutlu

AU - Christensen, Erik Damgaard

AU - Kirca, Özgür

AU - Sawicki, Andrzej

AU - Swidzinski, Waldemar

AU - Christensen, Erik Damgaard

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Geotechnical aspects of MUPs have been researched as part of the MERMAID project, with particular focus on the stability of foundation soils and their necessary scour protection. Deails of this work are published in a number of publications as provided in the reference list. Practitioners will be particularly drawn to the book “Liquefaction around Marine Structures” which covers many of the aforementioned subjects researched within MERMAID regarding liquefaction issues of platform designs (Sumer, 2014). The principal guidelines emerging from the complete body of work are: Sandy soils have a high liquefaction potential, the effect of which must be accounted for in foundation design.The presence of small quantities of fines within a sandy soil can act to increase the potential for wave-induced liquefaction. For the soils studied, this occurred for fine fractions up to 30% of total mass. Sandy soils with larger quantities of fines, or sandy clays, were less susceptible as the clay behaviour dominates above this fraction.Liquefaction risk under gravity base foundations should be screened properly in the light of in-situ and lab tests of the seabed soil. The preliminary screening methods in the literature (some of which cited here) can be used as a first assessment. If these assessments indicate any risks, detailed analyses and models should be applied for liquefaction assessment.When it comes to wave-induced liquefaction, standing waves would be seen in the vicinity of reflecting boundaries of platform foundations. Liquefaction under Standing waves, although qualitatively similar, show features different from that caused by progressive waves. The pore pressure accumulation and liquefaction starts at the nodal section, and progresses towards anti-nodal section due to a diffusion mechanism. The rate of liquefaction at the nodal section seems to be the same with the progressive wave case. Thus, mathematical models for progressive waves would also work for standing waves as far as the nodal section is concerned.Rock berms (protection cover) on pipelines and power transmission cables are essential to protect the structure from floating to the seabed surface due to liquefaction, and strongly suggested to be constructed. However, once the rock berm is constructed, care must be exercised on backfilling the excavated soil into the trench intentionally or due to sediment transport. Studies showed that a cover of stones constructed around the platform foundations for scour protection purpose would also serve for increasing the liquefaction resistance of surrounding soil. However, the stability of such stones against sinkage must also be assured, and studies are ongoing to provide guidelines for this too, which should be ready before the completion of the project (before M48).

AB - Geotechnical aspects of MUPs have been researched as part of the MERMAID project, with particular focus on the stability of foundation soils and their necessary scour protection. Deails of this work are published in a number of publications as provided in the reference list. Practitioners will be particularly drawn to the book “Liquefaction around Marine Structures” which covers many of the aforementioned subjects researched within MERMAID regarding liquefaction issues of platform designs (Sumer, 2014). The principal guidelines emerging from the complete body of work are: Sandy soils have a high liquefaction potential, the effect of which must be accounted for in foundation design.The presence of small quantities of fines within a sandy soil can act to increase the potential for wave-induced liquefaction. For the soils studied, this occurred for fine fractions up to 30% of total mass. Sandy soils with larger quantities of fines, or sandy clays, were less susceptible as the clay behaviour dominates above this fraction.Liquefaction risk under gravity base foundations should be screened properly in the light of in-situ and lab tests of the seabed soil. The preliminary screening methods in the literature (some of which cited here) can be used as a first assessment. If these assessments indicate any risks, detailed analyses and models should be applied for liquefaction assessment.When it comes to wave-induced liquefaction, standing waves would be seen in the vicinity of reflecting boundaries of platform foundations. Liquefaction under Standing waves, although qualitatively similar, show features different from that caused by progressive waves. The pore pressure accumulation and liquefaction starts at the nodal section, and progresses towards anti-nodal section due to a diffusion mechanism. The rate of liquefaction at the nodal section seems to be the same with the progressive wave case. Thus, mathematical models for progressive waves would also work for standing waves as far as the nodal section is concerned.Rock berms (protection cover) on pipelines and power transmission cables are essential to protect the structure from floating to the seabed surface due to liquefaction, and strongly suggested to be constructed. However, once the rock berm is constructed, care must be exercised on backfilling the excavated soil into the trench intentionally or due to sediment transport. Studies showed that a cover of stones constructed around the platform foundations for scour protection purpose would also serve for increasing the liquefaction resistance of surrounding soil. However, the stability of such stones against sinkage must also be assured, and studies are ongoing to provide guidelines for this too, which should be ready before the completion of the project (before M48).

M3 - Report

BT - D5.4 Guidelines for interaction between seabed and support structure

ER -

Brennan A, Sumer BM, Christensen ED, Kirca Ö, Sawicki A, Swidzinski W et al. D5.4 Guidelines for interaction between seabed and support structure. 2015. 27 p.