Cross-reactivity trends when selecting scFv antibodies against snake toxins using a phage display-based cross-panning strategy

Christoffer V. Sørensen*, Line Ledsgaard, Helen H. K. Wildenauer, Camilla H. Dahl, Tasja W. Ebersole, Markus-Frederik Bohn, Anne Ljungars, Timothy P. Jenkins, Andreas H. Laustsen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

71 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Antibodies with cross-reactive binding and broad toxin-neutralizing capabilities are advantageous for treating indications such as infectious diseases and animal envenomings. Such antibodies have been successfully selected against closely related antigens using phage display technology. However, the mechanisms driving antibody cross-reactivity typically remain to be elucidated. Therefore, we sought to explore how a previously reported phage display-based cross-panning strategy drives the selection of cross-reactive antibodies using seven different snake toxins belonging to three protein (sub-)families: phospholipases A2, long-chain α-neurotoxins, and short-chain α-neurotoxins. We showcase how cross-panning can increase the chances of discovering cross-reactive single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) from phage display campaigns. Further, we find that the feasibility of discovering cross-reactive antibodies using cross-panning cannot easily be predicted by analyzing the sequence, structural, or surface similarity of the antigens alone. However, when antigens share the (exact) same functions, this seems to increase the chances of selecting cross-reactive antibodies, which may possibly be due to the existence of structurally similar motifs on the antigens.
Original languageEnglish
Article number10181
JournalScientific Reports
Volume13
Number of pages10
ISSN2045-2322
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-reactivity trends when selecting scFv antibodies against snake toxins using a phage display-based cross-panning strategy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this