Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies

Marianne Gauffriau, Peder Olesen Larsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

For all rankings Of Countries research output based on number of publications or citations compared with population, GDP, R&D and public R&D expenses, and other national characteristics the counting method is decisive. Total counting (full credit to a country when at least one of the authors is from this country) and Fractional Counting (a country receives a fraction of full credit for a publication equal to the fraction of authors from this country) Of publications give widely different results. Counting methods must be stated, rankings based on different counting methods cannot be compared, and Fractional Counting is to be preferred.
Original languageEnglish
JournalScientometrics
Volume64
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)85-93
ISSN0138-9130
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this