Could baseline establishment be counterproductive for emissions reduction? Insights from Vietnam’s building sector

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article – Annual report year: 2018Researchpeer-review

Standard

Could baseline establishment be counterproductive for emissions reduction? Insights from Vietnam’s building sector. / Henrysson, Maryna; Lütken, Søren; Puig, Daniel.

In: Climate Policy, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2018, p. 459-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article – Annual report year: 2018Researchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{315a4092e21545b9b636dd761a5cee09,
title = "Could baseline establishment be counterproductive for emissions reduction? Insights from Vietnam’s building sector",
abstract = "This article provides insights into the role of institutions involved in climate governance working towards a future low-carbon society at the national level, within the global climate change governance architecture. Specifically, it contributes to understanding the fragmented governance of energy efficiency policy in developing countries by focussing on Vietnam’s building sector, identifying key institutions related to underlying discourses, national and international power relations, resource distribution and coalitions. It uses the case of baseline setting in developing Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) to illustrate institutional dynamics, nationally and transnationally, as well as to question whether demands for baseline setting achieve the ideal trade-off between actual GHG emissions reduction and institutionalized demands for accountability. The analysis reveals that, in addition to domestic efforts and challenges, the international agenda greatly influences the energy efficiency policy arena. The article presents lessons to be learnt about policy processes from the specific Vietnamese case, reflecting on the role of international actors and discourses in it. Finally, it argues for the abolition of baselines in favour of adequate monitoring and evaluation, from the perspective that requirement for deviation from fictitious baselines is unproductive and only serves an international techno-managerial discourse.",
keywords = "Baseline, Efficiency policy, Buildings sector, National Appropriate Mitigration Actions",
author = "Maryna Henrysson and S{\o}ren L{\"u}tken and Daniel Puig",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/14693062.2017.1304350",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "459--470",
journal = "Climate Policy",
issn = "1469-3062",
publisher = "Earthscan Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Could baseline establishment be counterproductive for emissions reduction? Insights from Vietnam’s building sector

AU - Henrysson, Maryna

AU - Lütken, Søren

AU - Puig, Daniel

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article provides insights into the role of institutions involved in climate governance working towards a future low-carbon society at the national level, within the global climate change governance architecture. Specifically, it contributes to understanding the fragmented governance of energy efficiency policy in developing countries by focussing on Vietnam’s building sector, identifying key institutions related to underlying discourses, national and international power relations, resource distribution and coalitions. It uses the case of baseline setting in developing Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) to illustrate institutional dynamics, nationally and transnationally, as well as to question whether demands for baseline setting achieve the ideal trade-off between actual GHG emissions reduction and institutionalized demands for accountability. The analysis reveals that, in addition to domestic efforts and challenges, the international agenda greatly influences the energy efficiency policy arena. The article presents lessons to be learnt about policy processes from the specific Vietnamese case, reflecting on the role of international actors and discourses in it. Finally, it argues for the abolition of baselines in favour of adequate monitoring and evaluation, from the perspective that requirement for deviation from fictitious baselines is unproductive and only serves an international techno-managerial discourse.

AB - This article provides insights into the role of institutions involved in climate governance working towards a future low-carbon society at the national level, within the global climate change governance architecture. Specifically, it contributes to understanding the fragmented governance of energy efficiency policy in developing countries by focussing on Vietnam’s building sector, identifying key institutions related to underlying discourses, national and international power relations, resource distribution and coalitions. It uses the case of baseline setting in developing Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) to illustrate institutional dynamics, nationally and transnationally, as well as to question whether demands for baseline setting achieve the ideal trade-off between actual GHG emissions reduction and institutionalized demands for accountability. The analysis reveals that, in addition to domestic efforts and challenges, the international agenda greatly influences the energy efficiency policy arena. The article presents lessons to be learnt about policy processes from the specific Vietnamese case, reflecting on the role of international actors and discourses in it. Finally, it argues for the abolition of baselines in favour of adequate monitoring and evaluation, from the perspective that requirement for deviation from fictitious baselines is unproductive and only serves an international techno-managerial discourse.

KW - Baseline

KW - Efficiency policy

KW - Buildings sector

KW - National Appropriate Mitigration Actions

U2 - 10.1080/14693062.2017.1304350

DO - 10.1080/14693062.2017.1304350

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 459

EP - 470

JO - Climate Policy

JF - Climate Policy

SN - 1469-3062

IS - 4

ER -